14142 items matching your search terms
...r Sanderson has said seems to have changed , so . . . WEIR M OLe INTERVIEW (19 JULY 2012) 57 BINNIE J : Yes, I can - here somewhere . I 'm and I don't know I 'm sorry, but I do you have the evidence before the Court of Appeal in October 2002. I 'm referring to page 1 1 05 and I ' l l read it out and I ' l l show it to you so that you can see - 5 MRWEIR: Yep, that's fine. BINNIE J : H e says that the sign ificance was that, "Th...
Notice of appeal to Environment Court against decision on proposed Auckland combined plan Dated: 16 September 2016 Before the Environment Court In the matter of: Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) - Appeal against decision on proposed Auckland combined plan – s 156(1) of the LGATPA – Topics 062, 063 & 081/083 - Rule H6.6.6 Height in relation to boundary – Residential – Terrac...
...Rules around review of decisions Some submitters were concerned that the Ombudsman does not have enough powers and, that the Ombudsman’s recommendations are not binding on agencies. Several submitters also commented that there is no ability to appeal or judicially review the Ombudsman’s recommendations. RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E 17 Protection against certain actions Around 5% of submitters expressed concern that the protections afforded to re...
... Women Public Toilet ‐ Ground Floor ‐ Flood in the toilet $129.79 MSD10090379 15/02/2019 Wellington ‐ District Court Level 4, Court Room 9 ‐ The defendant seat is broken $82.92 MSD10092741 20/02/2019 Wellington ‐ Court of Appeal Ground floor, Public toilet ‐ Water leaking from the bottom of the toilet base $89.44 MSD10092976 21/02/2019 Te Awamutu ‐ District Court Damaged Trellis (Fencing) outside the Court Building $458.43 MSD...
...There are potential disproportionate outcomes due to the potential loss of the main form of transport in situations where a family or work vehicle is impounded. However, under the LTA, an owner whose motor vehicle has been seized and impounded may appeal against such action to the: • Police, under s102, and • the District Court, under s110 (if a person has unsuccessfully appealed under s102). 183. Offences in relation to careless driving causing injury or death (s38 LTA) or fa...
...34 NATIONAL PÄNUI - Here-Turi-Köka / AUGUST 2020 MÄORI APPELLATE COURT At Hamilton | Mäori Land Court, Level 2, BNZ Centre 354-358 Victoria Street, Hamilton Wednesday 5 August 2020 | Judges C M Wainwright (Presiding), S F Reeves, T M Wara Appeal for Hearing PÄNUI NO: TIME: APPLICATION NO: SECTION: APPLICANT: SUBJECT: AAug1 10:00AM A20200004983 58/93 John Thornton McLeod Appeal 2020/3 - Harataunga West 2B 2A 1 (Te Paea o Hauraki Mäori Reservation) and a decision of the Court...
...There are potential disproportionate outcomes due to the potential loss of the main form of transport in situations where a family or work vehicle is impounded. However, under the LTA, an owner whose motor vehicle has been seized and impounded may appeal against such action to the: • Police, under s102, and • the District Court, under s110 (if a person has unsuccessfully appealed under s102). 183. Offences in relation to careless driving causing injury or death (s38 LTA) or fa...
...Court’s task is to examine objectively the employer’s decision-making process and determine whether what the employer did, and how it was done, were steps which were open to a fair and reasonable employer. 7 [165] Recently, the Court of Appeal emphasised this point in A Ltd v H. 8 It said: 9 It is apparent that the effect of the statute is that there may be a variety of ways of achieving a fair and reasonable result in a particular case. As the Court in Angus observed,...
...Street, Whangärei Monday 17 February 2020 | Judge Clark, Judge Coxhead, Judge Stone presiding Application for Hearing PÄNUI NO: TIME: APPLICATION NO: SECTION: APPLICANT: SUBJECT: A1 10:00AM A20190007602 58/93 Horomona Herewini, Erehi Herewini Appeal 2019/12 – Te Tii Mangonui A3 and an order of the Mäori Land Court made on 27 Juine 2019 at 192 Taitokerau MB 170-176 – Notice of Appeal At Rotorua | Mäori Land Court, Hauora House, 1143 Haupapa Street, Rotorua Tuesday 18 February...
...the language of the Code is straightforward; it is easy to understand, and Mr Q appropriately accepted that he was aware of his obligations. [96] Furthermore, in Chief Executive of the Department of Inland Revenue v Buchanan 18 the Court of Appeal made it clear that the proper approach is to consider whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the employee could be expected to know of relevant obligations. It was held that where the employer had made a