Search Results

1. [2019] NZEmpC 113 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories Ltd v Scott [pdf, 576 KB]

   ...and confidence, but also on a legislative requirement for good faith behaviour; and by acknowledging and addressing the inherent inequality of power in employment relationships. [68] In NZ Tax Refunds Ltd v Brooks Homes Ltd, the Court of Appeal confirmed interim injunction principles as follows:5 The approach to an application for an interim injunction is well established. The applicant must first establish that there is a serious question to be tried or, put another way...

2. LCRO 203/2017 HI v JK (6 August 2020) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...scope of review [38] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

3. Schimanski - Succession to Tamati Hapimana [2022] Chief Judges MB 489 (2022 CJ 489).pdf [pdf, 798 KB]

   ...for the surname “Chapman” is “Hapimana”. 28. Finally, sections 48(1) and (2) of the 1993 Act states: 48 Matters already finalised or pending (1) No order made by the Chief Judge under section 44, or made by the Appellate Court on appeal from any such order, shall take away or affect any right or interest acquired for value and in good faith under any instrument of alienation registered before the making of any such order. (2) No payment made in good faith pursu...

4. LCRO 164/2014 WN and JM v SG [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...scope of review [46] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:5 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

5. Evesham v Auckland Standards Committee LCRO 136 / 2009 (5 November 2009) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...is privileged this may amount to such a good reason. [33] The fact that a solicitor may not claim privilege in respect of a demand of him or her to produce evidence in response to a professional complaint was determined by the English Court of Appeal in Parry-Jones v Law Society (1969) 1 Ch 1; [1966] 1 All ER 177. It is of note that the privilege in this case belongs to Mr Chesterfield and not to Mr D Evesham. Lawyer-client privilege gives Mr Chesterfield a right to refuse to produc...

6. LCRO 034/2017 TC v DM (30 April 2019) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...scope of review [20] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:2 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

7. LCRO 158/2019 RL v BN, TG and VK (1 April 2021) [pdf, 604 KB]

   ...and scope of review The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:5 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

8. Appendix-10_Michael-Thompson_s87F-Report_Water-Take-and-Allocation_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 893 KB]

   ...in stream flow are unlikely to adversely affect the specific values and attributes listed above in a more than minor way. However, it seems plausible at least that flow- 14 Schedule F (https://pnrp.gw.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Chapter-12-Schedules-Appeal- version-2023.pdf). 15 Migratory species are indicated in italics and the conservation status of “At Risk” and “Nationally Vulnerable” species are underlined and in bold, respectively. https://pnrp.gw.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Chap...

9. QX v ZW LCRO 134/2014 (21 October 2016) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...the LCRO on Review [97] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:34 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 187 Gisborne District Council v Barraclough [pdf, 6.2 MB]

    ...advised that Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd was engaged to provide a technical peer review of the geotechnical and erosion and sediment control documents in relation to the development of the properties. 3 [3] On 11 January 2024, Mr Barraclough appealed1 against an abatement notice dated 20 December 2023 requiring the immediate stabilisation of all exposed areas of earthworks. An application for stay of the abatement notice was also filed. A hearing of the stay application too...