Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Hawkes Bay [pdf, 4.8 MB]

   RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT lIB HAWKE'S BAY DEAN COWIE SEPTEMBER 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Ramer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District l1A: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 12: The Wellington District, Dr R Anderson and K Pickens District 13: The Nor

2. West & Anor as Trustees of the Christine West Family Trust v Perry [pdf, 769 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 02368 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN CHRISTINE MURIEL WEST and WILLIAM HENRY HAWKEN as Trustees of the CHRISTINE WEST FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND GLENN ANDREW PERRY and LYNDA MAREE PERRY First Respondents AND JESSOP ARCHITECTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND BERNIE W LEE trading as Island 2000 Third Respondent AND No fourth respondents, Michael Craig Norgate an

3. Peacocke - Part Puketiti 2B 2B 1 Block and Lot 1-Deposited Plan South Auckland 33533 (2020) 205 Waikato Maniapoto MB 202 (205 WMN 202) [pdf, 348 KB]

   ...[30]. 17 Above n 13 at [36]. 18 Above n 13 at [37]. 19 Moore v Oakura F2A (2019) 2004 Taitokerau MB 64 (204 TTK 164). 20 Māori Affairs Act 1953, s 233(1). 21 Above n 19 at [19]. 205 Waikato Maniapoto MB 214 [52] That decision was appealed. In Moore – Part Oakura F2A the Māori Appellate Court agreed with the approach taken by Judge Wara, which was that the status of a block of land could not change merely by definition and a transfer to a non-Māori.22 They held t...

4. BORA Criminal Record (Expungement of Convictions for Historical Homosexual Offences) Bill [pdf, 8.6 MB]

   ...of legal proceedings commenced before the commence- ment of this Act; or (b) the commencing of legal proceedings on or after the commencement of this Act. (2) However, proceedings in subclause (1)(a) or (b) decided (at fast instance, or on any appeal) on or after the commencement of this Act must be decided sub- ject to this Act (including section 21 (no entitlement to compensation)). (3) This clause applies even if, and to the extent that, the proceedings concerned are amended befo...

5. [2022] NZREADT 16 - CAC 2102 v He & An (15 August 2022) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...decision. Written submissions on behalf of Mr He and Mr An are to be filed and served within a further 10 working days. [117] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of Appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in Part 20 of the High Court Rules 2016. ___________________ Mrs C Sandelin Deputy Chairperson ___________________ Mr G Denley Member ________...

6. SV v WT LCRO 21/2013 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...has broad powers to conduct her own investigations, including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator, and seek and receive evidence. The statutory power of review is much broader than an appeal, and gives the LCRO discretion as to the approach to be taken on any particular review, and the extent of the investigations necessary to conduct that review. Review Hearing [19] The parties attended a review hearing on 15 July 20...

7. National Standards Committee v Denham [2017] NZLCDT 10 [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...of bad faith and abuse of process. [72] We have reminded ourselves that the Tribunal cannot rely on these determinations as proof of facts in issue before us, and that we must make our own enquiries. We refer to the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Deliu:9 “First, as Mr Morgan QC points out in his submissions for the Committee, the question whether judgments can be used as evidence in disciplinary hearings depends on the use the judgments are being put to in the particular case....

8. Dickinson v Southon - Section 4A Block IV Tokaanu Township [2023] Chief Judge's MB 499 (2023 CJ 499) [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...courts where tikanga has been 8 Ashwell – Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell) [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209 (2009 CJ 209); Tau v Nga Whanau o Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX Block [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167); Puna v Puna Rotopounamu 1B1A [2022] Chief Judge’s MB 28 (2022 CJ 28); Inia v Julian [2020] NZCA 423; Amos – Horahora 1A4B, 1A4F [2002] Chief Judge’s MB 54 (2002 CJ 54). 2023 Chief Judge's MB 516 recognised as...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 19 Warmington & ONeill v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...information), the information that they do have is likely to be of use to Silver Fern Farms. [72] The difficulties associated with inadvertent disclosure were traversed in The Littlewoods Organisation Ltd v Harris. 13 There the English Court of Appeal observed that: 14 11 AEC 14/95, 10 March 1995. 12 At [29]. 13 [1978] 1 All ER 1026. 14 At 1033. It is thus established that an employer can stipulate for...

10. [2020] NZEnvC 114 Summerset Villages Lower Hutt Limited v Hutt City Council [pdf, 31 MB]

    ...received a letter dated 19 June 2020 from Mr I Mclauchlan (a s 274 party) complaining about aspects of the Interim Decision. It is not the function of this decision to debate those matters. Any parties dissatisfied with our decision have rights of appeal to the High Court and should take competent legal advice regarding that, including advice as to the issue of admissibility of evidence which was a feature of Mr Mclauchlan's letter. Directions [128] Summerset is to review the...