Search Results

1. Rapana v Anderson - Te Kōmiti Matua o te Haahi Rātana (2024) 492 Aotea MB 95 (492 AOT 95) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...accountability to the relevant group of Māori? (d) Is there clear evidence that the person or group has been undertaking representative activities? 9 Aperahama v Anderson – Section 57 of the Rātana Pā [2022] Māori Appellate Court MB 424 (2022 APPEAL 424). 492 Aotea MB 105 (e) Is there utility in making a representative order? (f) Does the order provide clarity for third parties seeking to engage with the relevant group of Māori? (g) Can the issue be resolved out...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 262 Director-General of Conservation v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   ...of Conservation v Northland Regional Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 262 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against a decision granting resource consent application for taking groundwater from various aquifer sub- units of the Aupōuri Aquifer, Northland BETWEEN DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2021-AKL-129) Appellant AND NORTHLA...

3. [2011] NZEmpC 34 Martin v Northland Education Trust Inc [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...evidence may affect the remedy of reinstatement. Here, it may be in issue both under s 124 of the Act (contributory conduct going to the nature and extent of remedies) and it may otherwise affect the extent of remedies as established in the Court of Appeal in Salt v Fell. 4 [67] It is, however, necessary to analyse and make findings on that evidence because some of it is disputed by the plaintiff and, even if it is undisputed, its significance and weight requires consideration an...

4. Geldenhuys v C Yap [2013] NZIACDT 27 (12 April 2013) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...Geldenhuys paid $1,950 which was not refundable, and that was credited toward the work undertaken. [35.6] Ms Geldenhuys had been sent invoices for the work undertaken. Ms Yap said that accompanying documents proved that to be the case. However, on appeal no invoices have been produced. There are two screenshots in which Ms Yap says shows a computer record of documents being printed and emailed, but the documents and the email record are not included in this material. [35.7] The no-r...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 20 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust [pdf, 385 KB]

   ...person to become aware of the bruising and it was her comment to Ms Lunam in about October 2017 that eventually led to Ms Henry being informed. [82] The test for disparity of treatment was dealt with in Buchanan.12 In that case the Court of Appeal posed three questions. Is there disparity of treatment? If so, is there an adequate explanation for the disparity? If not, is the dismissal justified, notwithstanding the disparity for which there is no explanation?13 [83] B did no...

6. Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Consent Authorities • Physical Sciences • Medical Testing • Metrology and Calibration • Radiology Services. Chairpersons of each PAC are members of the Accreditation Advisory Committee (AAC). The AAC and/or the Council may adjudicate any appeals arising from IANZ accreditations. Records Records are maintained on client registrations, assessments, reports and correspondences. A directory of IANZ accreditations is maintained and made available for public viewing on www.ian...

7. Z v Secretary for Justice [2023] NZRA 001 (28 March 2023) [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...researching the law, interviewing witnesses, briefing of evidence, drafting documents, examining witnesses, cross-examination, making submissions, making opening/closing addresses, appearing at sentence, and appearances in support of or in response to an appeal. 5 AE v Secretary for Justice [2012] NZRA 005 at [15]. 6 At [16]. 7 At [17]. 9 [39] In a later case, SB v Secretary for Justice8, the Review Authority confirmed that the concept of substantial and active involveme...

8. [2007] SFWU v ADHB and Ors WN WC 18/07 [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...the present context, in New Zealand. Legal words and phrases dictionaries are similarly unhelpful. So, too, is the record of the parliamentary history of the Employment Relations Amendment Act (No 2) 2004. [48] In Canada, the Ontario Court of Appeal considered the word in a criminal context in R v Rochon 2003 CanLII 9600; (2003) 173 CCC (3d) 321 at paras 57-58: … I do not think the word “support” is impermissible in the context of a proper definition of “abet” …. …...

9. Collective impact toolbox [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...through this process, you can convince them, they may help convince others. Who will make the decision? Who actually will make the go/no-go decision for your idea? How can you influence them? What are their concerns? What features of your idea will appeal? How will risk be minimised? People feel loss more acutely than gain, even for the same objective amount. Show people how their interests will still be protected if things go wrong. Who are the other stakeholders? Who would the idea a...

10. Thomson - Part Tahorakuri A1 Sec1 Māori Reservation (2002) 76 Taupō MB 98 (76 TPO 98) [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...arguably exists where a trustee calls on the Maori Land Court's supervisory role in relation to Maori land trusts . . Mr LaHatte in his submissions refers to the decision of Proprietors of Mangakino Township v The Maori Land Court (Court of Appeal 65/99). This decision simply illustrates the broad interpretation given to the Maori Land Court's supervisory powers and guardianship role in relation to Maori land trusts. It does not detract from the general rule that trustees must...