14049 items matching your search terms
RAEWYN WALLACE v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2021] NZCA 506 [4 October 2021] IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA534/2021 [2021] NZCA 506 BETWEEN RAEWYN WALLACE Applicant AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL Respondent Counsel: G E Minchin for Applicant Judgment: (On the papers) 4 October 2021 at 10.00 am JUDGMENT OF MILLER J (Review of Registrar’s Decision) The application for review of th...
BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2014] NZACA 10 ACA 9/13 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN GARY BAIGENT Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING: 31 March 2014 at Wellington AUTHORITY: Robyn Bedford COUNSEL: Mr Miller, counsel for the appellant; Mr McBride, counsel for the respondent...
Stephens v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 119 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BARRY STEPHENS (ENV-2022-AKL-000144) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND AUCKLAND TRANSPORT MICHAEL GRAEME WECK JUDITH AND SCOTT GAVIN S274 parties Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey sitting alone under s...
...& ORS v MDC – pMEP – TOPIC 12 AIR QUALITY – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 137 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN THE MINISTER OF DEFENCE (ENV-2020-CHC-76) (…continued on separate page) Appellants AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitt...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZENVC \ C\ 3 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal against an abatement notice under section 325 of the Act E FIGUEIREDO (ENV-2020-AKL-000164) Appellant NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Date of Decision: 1·:r NovlMbcr uio Date of Issue: 11 No•✓e111l 11' lolo DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The abatement notice is w...
...Expert sentencing reports Expert witness/reports Section 38 – forensic reports Restorative justice report (Interlocutory) Appeals to the High Court Appeal against disclosure decision (interim) Appeal against disclosure decision (completion) Appeal against disclosure decision (full)...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 44 READT 041/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN HENRY BARFOOT Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1902) First Respondent AND LEJUN (JAMES) WU and SHUNYI (CANDY) CAO Second Respondents On the papers: Tribunal: Mr J Doogue (Deputy Chairperson) Ms C Sandelin (Member...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 2 READT 015/16 UNDER THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 111 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JOHN BURNETT (For Investor Business Brokers Ltd) Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 404) First respondent AND ALAN SOO Second respondent Hearing: 6 December 2016 Tribunal: Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger...
POWERCO LTD V NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 214 IN THE MATTER of an appeal against a proposed policy or plan under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN POWERCO LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-0000154) Appellant / Applicant AND NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Hearing: On the papers Last case...
...The application for an extension of time to file submissions is dismissed. ____________________________________________________________________ REASONS Introduction [1] Mr AlKazaz currently has an application before this Court for leave to appeal a decision of the Employment Court. He now applies for a stay of the Employment Court proceedings. Procedural history [2] In 2017, Mr AlKazaz succeeded in an unjustified dismissal claim against the respondent (EIT) in t...