Search Results

1. IQ Ltd v D Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 674 (8 September 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

2. KT Ltd v TL [2024] NZDT 766 (19 November 2024) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

3. LT v GI [2024] NZDT 804 (25 September 2024) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

4. OD v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 738 (16 October 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

5. 2017 NZSSAA 052 (15 September 2017) [pdf, 238 KB]

   [2017] NZSSAA 052 Reference No. SSA 39, 46, 54, 59, 66, 88 & 134/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by X of Z against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee DATE OF MINUTE Friday, 15 September 2017 DECISION (ON INTERLOCUTORY ISSUES) Overview [1] The appellant lodged these seven appeals during 2016. They are against seven decisions of the Chief Executive; each has been the...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 100 Director-General of Conservation v Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency [pdf, 336 KB]

   Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Waka Kotahi – New Zealand Transport Agency IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 100 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2019-WLG-003) (ENV-2019-WLG-004) TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI TAMA TRUST (ENV-2019-WLG-005) TE KOROWAI TIAKI O TE HAUĀURU INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-WLG-009) POUTAMA K...

7. [2020] NZIACDT 19 - DMX v Guich (11 May 2020) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: Self-represented Adviser: Self-represented 2 PRELIMINARY [1] Mr Martin Antonio Guich, the adviser, represented DMX, the complainant, on an unsuccessful residence application. He appealed on her behalf, but it was dismissed as he was too late as a result of miscalculating the appeal period. [2] A complaint by the complainant against Mr Guich to the Immigration Advisers Authority (Authority) was referred to the Trib...

8. Hartlepool v Basildon LCRO 79 / 2009 (3 September 2009) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...The court issued a judgment on 30 September 2008. Ms Hartlepool was unsuccessful in her application and costs were awarded against her. There then followed various exchanges between Ms Hartlepool and Mr Basildon relating to the possibility of an appeal. Those exchanges culminated in Mr Basildon applying, successfully, to be removed from the record as Ms Hartlepool's lawyer. [3] Ms Hartlepool was of the view that Mr Basildon had failed in his obligations to her in refusing or fa...

9. Adams v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACA 8 [pdf, 175 KB]

   ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND [2015] NZACA 8 ACA 2/2015 Michael Adams Applicant Accident Compensation Corporation Respondent Before: D J Plunkett Counsel for the Applicant: D J Allan Counsel for the Respondent: P A McBride Date of Decision: 4 August 2015 __________________________________________________________________ DECISION __________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION [1] T...

10. [2016] NZSSAA 047 (24 May 2016) [pdf, 40 KB]

    [2016] NZSSAA 047 Reference No. SSA 176/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Lower Hutt against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr R D Burnard − Chairperson Mr K Williams − Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 14 April 2016 APPEARANCES Mr G Howell for the appellant Mr R Signal for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Developme...