14049 items matching your search terms
ACR 255/18 IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 170 ACR 255/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NATHAN HARVEY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Mr A Beck for the applicant Mr...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 06 READT 045/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RICHARD GRANT WHEELER Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1901) First Respondent AND MICHAEL LEDGER Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal Mr J Doogue (Deputy Chairperson) Mr G Denley (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member)...
[2018] NZSSAA 31 Reference No. SSAA 154/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair C Joe - Member Hearing at Whangarei on 23 May 2018 Appearances The appellant in person Ms Ji, agent for the Chief Executive DECISION Introduction [1] There are two preliminary matte...
...their actions. However, relevant English and Australian cases have held that the person must be completely incapacitated as a result of the disability to be absolved from liability: for example, Dunnage v Randall [2015] EWCA Civ 673 (English Court of Appeal); Carrier v Bonham [2001] QCA 234 (Queensland Court of Appeal). On this view there is no modification of the ordinary objective standard of care and HL would only avoid liability where he did not act at all or there was a complete impai...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000098 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY HAMILT...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI OTAUTAHI IN THE MA TIER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 196 of the Resource Management Act 1991 an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act R STEWART (ENV-2021-CHC-23) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan - sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Order: 6 October 2022 CONSEN...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000090 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN WAIKATO RIVER AUTHORITY Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY HAMILTON...
...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...
...working days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceeding...
[2018] NZSSAA 13 Reference No. SSAA 13/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair K Williams - Member C Joe - Member DECISION Background [1] XXXX (the appellant) appeals the decision on 24 August 2016 (upheld by a Benefits Review Committee) to establish and seek repayment of...