Search Results

1. D v T LCRO 36 / 2009 (27 March 2009) [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...accompanied by the prescribed fee (if any)”. The prescribed fee is $30. The fee did not accompany the informal application of 12 March but was received only on 18 March 2009. [12] The failure to pay a prescribed fee for the bringing of an appeal or other application that a decision be reviewed will be fatal to an application. This will be the case even where the fee is subsequently paid. In Cahayag v Removal Review Authority [1998] 2 NZLR 72; [1998] NZAR 145 a notice of appea...

2. UN v BF Ltd [2022] NZDT 138 (6 September 2022) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...required to park in this car park. He did not have one, and he was unable to discover how to acquire one. He stayed in the car park for 54 minutes, sitting in his vehicle. 2. BF Ltd issued UN with a parking breach notice dated 5 May 2022, which UN appealed against on 25 May 2022. BF Ltd refused his appeal, although UN says that he did not receive this communication. UN appealed again on 10 June 2022, 13 June 2022 and 14 June 2022. BF Ltd responded to and refused each of these appeals....

3. OIA-110476.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Information Act 1982 (the Act) of 28 February 2024. Specifically, you requested: 1. How many men, per calendar year, have been convicted of a criminal sex charge over the last five years? In New Zealand. 2. How many men, per calendar year, have appealed a criminal sex conviction over the last five years in New Zealand? 3. How many men, per calendar year, have successfully been acquitted or had the sex charges quashed over the last five years in New Zealand? On 5 April 2024, the Minist...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 218 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v CultureSafe New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...had jurisdiction in respect of three of four directions; and that the Court therefore had jurisdiction to consider whether orders under s 134A and/or s 196 of the Act should be made.2 [6] The defendants did not bring any application for leave to appeal that judgment, within the timeframe allowed for under the Act.3 [7] Parallel to these steps, judicial review proceedings were brought against the DHB and other parties regarding a number of determinations of the Authority, and judgm...

5. Staniland v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2023] NZACC 76 [pdf, 145 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 76 ACR 111/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KRISTIAN STANILAND Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 11 May 2023 Held at: Wellington by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self represented T Gee for the Accident Compensation Corporati...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 023 Chen v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 275 KB]

   Chen v NZ Transport Agency IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 023 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WEIRONG CHEN (ENV-2020-AKL-169) Appellant AND NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY – WAKA KOTAHI Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick Hearing: On the papers Last case event: 19 January 2023 Date of Decision: 9 February 2...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 153 Remediation (NZ) Limited v Taranaki Regional Council [pdf, 178 KB]

   Remediation (NZ) Limited v Taranaki Regional Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 153 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN REMEDIATION (NZ) LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-059) Appellant AND TARANAKI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Hearing: On the papers Last case event: 8 September 2021 Date of Decision: 4 O...

8. Nabi & Fang v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Ors [2016] NZREADT 80 [pdf, 137 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 80 READT 018/16 UNDER THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 111 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANEEZ NABI & JIAJING FANG Applicants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 403) First respondent AND MICHAEL ZHOU & TINA SHI Second respondents Tribunal: Ms K Davenport QC − Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger – Member M...

9. [2023] NZEnvC 136 Quigley v Waikato District Council [pdf, 897 KB]

   S and K Quigley and The Quigley Family Trust v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 136 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN K QUIGLEY S QUIGLEY THE QUIGLEY FAMILY TRUST (ENV-2022-AKL-000024) Appellants AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge S M Tepania sitti...

10. [2016] NZSSAA 005 (16 February 2016) [pdf, 77 KB]

    [2016] NZSSAA 005 Reference No. SSA 145/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member HEARING at AUCKLAND on 10 August 2015 and 14 October 2015 and on the papers APPEARANCES The appellant in person Mr B Moodley for Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development DECIS...