14059 items matching your search terms
1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT / I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA AT AUCKLAND UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act BETWEEN THE ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV – 2020 – AKL – 000094) Appellant WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO APPEA...
1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT / I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA AT AUCKLAND UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act BETWEEN DAIRYNZ LIMITED (ENV – 2020 – AKL – 000097) Appellant WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO APPEAL 29 SEPTEMBER 2020 Counsel i...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Environment Judge C J Thompson Decision [2017] NZEnvC02_L ENV-2016-AKL-000188, 195; 203 and 239 of appeals under s 156 of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 against decisions of the Auckland Council on recommendations of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan J LENIHAN THE PUHOI COMMUNITY FORUM INCORPORATED B FRIZZELL WT COLGAN, B S...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 111 ACR 223/17 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN IVAN STRYDER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Heard at: Dunedin/Otepoti Appearances: Mr P Sara for the appellant Mr I Hunt for the respondent Judgment: 21...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000083 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN OJI FIBRE SOLUTIONS (NZ) LIMITED Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent
‘NEILLIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 181 ACR 119/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN C O’NEILL Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing On the papers Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented B Johns for the Respondent Judgment: 20 Sept...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000085 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE BY SOUTH WAIKA...
...EASTERN FISH AND GAME COUNCIL Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent 4172753 TO: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LTD ("Fonterra") wishes to be a party to an appeal by Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Council ("Fish and Game") against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council ("Council") on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan ("PC 1")....
...DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent 4169702 TO: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LTD ("Fonterra") wishes to be a party to an appeal by the Director-General of Conservation ("DOC") against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council ("Council") on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan ("PC 1"). Nature of interest...
...contempt findings and for the imposition of penalties against each defendant. The stay is sought in light of the fact there is a relevant application for judicial review of a preliminary judgment issued in this proceeding, brought in the Court of Appeal. [2] When the application for stay was brought, I was advised there was also an application for stay of this proceeding before the Court of Appeal. I concluded it was preferable for that Court to resolve the stay application rathe...