Search Results

1. Tatana v Matthews - General Land Lot A DP 83617 (2023) 471 Aotea MB 209 (471 AOT 209) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...[7] Following Matu Tatana’s passing and more recently, there appears to have been a breakdown in relationships within the Tatana whānau. For example, disputes between whānau members have been before the Family Court, involving restraining and protection orders. Disputes have arisen about who is entitled to live on Hautonga Reserve. [8] On 18 January 2021, Ada Tatana filed an application to redefine the purpose of Hautonga Reserve. At that time, her son and caregiver, Dougl...

2. Auckland Standards Committee v Khan [2014] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...and an order subsequently being made that Mr Raheman not be employed by any legal firm in future. [7] Thus it is quite clear that the practitioner was let down by his employee. [8] The Tribunal considers that it is axiomatic that extreme care has to be taken in completing any Solicitor’s Certificate. As Mr McCoubrey submitted, this is in a special category of documents which are reserved to be the province of legal practitioners. Furthermore, lending organisations rely o...

3. Family-Court-Associates-position-description-and-appointments-information [pdf, 615 KB]

   ...2023. Sections 7A to 7K (inclusive) of the Family Court Act 1980 provide the legislative framework to establish the role. Included are sections prescribing the appointment process and criteria for appointment, the term of appointment and immunity protections for a Family Court Associate. A Family Court Associate will fulfil a vitally important role in the hierarchy of decision-making in the Family Court. A Family Court Associate will be empowered to take on some of a Family Court judge’...

4. 2021-10-15 PC8 - Hearing Notice [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Auckland...

5. 2022-03-02 Hearing Notice - PC8 (Urban Provisions) - Commencing Monday 21 March 2022 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Au...

6. Liufau v Letalu [2014] NZIACDT 92 (18 September 2014) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...was in New Zealand unlawfully and sought Mr Letalu’s assistance to apply for a visa. The complainant paid fees and, after a long delay, the Adviser lodged an application. [2.2] Mr Letalu did not have a written agreement and his conduct lacked due care and diligence. [3] The Tribunal upheld the complaint and found Mr Letalu failed to meet minimum professional standards in that he failed to commence the professional relationship in accordance with clause 1.5 of the Code of Conduct (201...

7. 2022-03-01 PC8 (Urban) Hearing Notice - further updated [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...(Queenstown), PO Box 201, DX ZP95010, Queenstown Interested Party S274 Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Phil Murray Resource Management Ltd Interested Party S274 Pine Terrace Ltd Nicole Dowling Interested Party S274 Pomahaka Water Care Group Pomahaka Water Care Group Interested Party S274 Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Puketoi Farming Company Ltd Interested Party S274 Queenstown Lakes District Council Brandon Watts, Meredith Connell, PO Box 90750, Auckland...

8. BORA Christ Church Cathedral Reinstatement Bill [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...recommendation, or decision. 6. Judicial review is an essential mechanism for maintaining the rule of law. The right to apply for judicial review should therefore be limited only in the rarest of situations where there is compelling reason and after careful consideration. 7. In our view, the justifications for the limit imposed on the right to judicial review by cl 8(3) are finely balanced against the importance of s 27(2). We consider, however, that the time-limit on applying for judic...

9. [2020] NZREADT 36 - Complaints Assessment Committee 1904 v Bright (24 August 2020) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...under s 73(a) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (“the Act”), with an alternative charge of misconduct under s 73(c)(iii) of the Act (for a wilful or reckless contravention of r 6.3 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012. The hearing is scheduled for 28/29 September 2020. [2] The charges against Mr Bright follow a complaint being made that he behaved inappropriately towards a prospective purchaser (“the complainant”) during her vie...

10. Nelson Standards Committee v Dallison [2011] NZLCDT 40 [pdf, 66 KB]

    ...was pleaded in an alternative form, other than particular 3. Those admitted and forming the basis for penalty are as follows: (a) In contravention of Chapter 3.4 and/or Chapter 3.5 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (“the Rules”), he provided to the D’s a document headed ”Standard Terms of Engagement and Information for Clients of Peter R Dallison Rules of Conduct and Client Care” that does not satisfy the requirements of Chapte...