LCRO 45/2020 MN v RK (22 December 2020) [pdf, 249 KB]
...Mr MN against the title of [Address], [Suburbia] on around 7 February 2019; and 3 (b) whether Mr MN failed to use legal processes for a proper purpose in breach of rule 2.3 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules); and (c) whether Mr MN’s conduct fell below the standard of competence and diligence that a member of the public is entitled to expect of a reasonably competent lawyer; and/or (d) whether Mr MN’s conduct woul...