Search Results

1. Taueki v McMillan - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2014) 324 Aotea MB 144 (324 AOT 144) [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...block as a Māori reservation as a wāhi tapu per s 338(1)(b) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”). Ms Taueki argues that for cultural and historical reasons it is in accordance with tikanga Māori that the subject land should be protected by the overlay of Māori reservation status as a wāhi tapu. She also says that this is also consistent with the requirements of kaitiakitanga, that the land and the lake are protected for the benefit of the Muaūpoko tribe and its...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 109 Norsho Bulc Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC IOcr of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act NORSHO BULC LIMITED (ENV-2016-AKL-000168) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent BLACKBRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED Section 274 party Environment Judge D Kirkpatrick Environment Commissioner I Buchanan Environment Commissioner Evon Dadelszen at Auckland on 22 - 24 May 2017 J M Savage for Norsho Bulc Ltd G C Lanni...

3. Hart v Auckland Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Society CIV 2012 404 5076 5528 [pdf, 515 KB]

   ...Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal (“the Tribunal”). The charges were laid by the Auckland Standards Committee No 1 under the provisions of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (“LCA”), and under the Conduct and Client Care Rules 2008 (“the Rules”). The charges Charges one and two [2] These charges arose after Mr Hart hired a private investigator, Mr D, to carry out investigation work for a client whom Mr Hart was representing in relation to c...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 179 Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ........................................................................ 27 Coastal - General Coastal Marine Zone (Chapter F) ............................................... 31 National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health .............................................................................................. 32 Overall Activity Status / Bundling .............................................................................. 3...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 036 Wood & Henton v Auckland Council [pdf, 9.8 MB]

   ...(SSESCP) - Condition 35; e. Chemical Treatment Management Plan (CHTMP) (if required in accordance with Condition 62) - Condition 60; f. Historic Heritage Management Plan (HHMP) (if required in accordance with condition 48) - Condition 46; g. Tree Protection Management Plan (TPMP) - Condition 38; and h. Ecological Management Plan (EMP) (incorporating relevant Fauna Management Plans) - Condition 41; i. Avifauna Management Plan - Condition 44. Advice Note - Management Plans: 1. Ce...

6. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 TGKL lay attach 8 state of gulf [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...Gulf Forum c/o Auckland Council Private Bag 42300 Auckland, 1142 The Hauraki Gulf Forum is a statutory body, established under the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000, responsible for the promotion and facilitation of integrated management and the protection and enhancement of the Hauraki Gulf. The Forum has representation on behalf of the Ministers of Conservation, Fisheries and Mäori Affairs, elected representatives from Auckland Council (including the Great Barrier and Waiheke loc...

7. 2020-10-12-Key-Issues-Report-9-October-2020.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...Regional Plan: Waste for Otago), having considered it to be part of a proposal of national significance, and directed that it be referred to the Environment Court for decision.1 1.3 This Key Issues Report has been commissioned by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and prepared under section 149G(3) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA).2 It is a report on the key issues in relation to the Omnibus Plan Change and includes: a. A summary of the state of the environment i...

8. LCRO 61/2024 VO and EO v Law Firm A and Ors (16 April 2025) [pdf, 319 KB]

   ...the father settled a trust (the Trust), with the company as sole trustee, and transferred ownership of his home to it. [6] Under the trust deed, the father was the “Principal Beneficiary” of the “Primary Beneficiaries” as well as the “Protector”. As Protector, he had the right to require information from the trustee and various powers including the power to appoint and remove trustees. [7] The applicant and the brother were the “Class B Primary Beneficiaries” and j...

9. LCRO 40/2021 PT v UT and RL t/a Law Firm A (28 April 2022) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...Mr PT’s response to the complaint and having then formed the view that Mr PT’s response was lacking in contrition, Mr RL and Mr UT considered that it would be appropriate for the 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules). 5 Committee to direct that Mr PT provide [LAW FIRM A], Mr SZ, Mrs QT and Ms AI, with a letter of apology. [16] Mr JK (for Mr PT) provided a further response to the complaints on 20 December 2019. It was su...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 220 Chen v New Zealand Transport Agency - Waka Kotahi [pdf, 662 KB]

    ...where those effects include the acquisition of private property or other derogation from the rights of a person with an interest in that property. The phrase “having particular regard to” in relation to relevant considerations has been carefully analysed by the High Court as follows (footnotes omitted):5 [64] Plainly the phrase “shall have particular regard to” conveys a stronger direction than merely “to have regard to”. Section 7 (which includes the phrase) is one...