Search Results

1. Directory of Official Information S-U [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...responsible for the intelligence and security agencies issue Ministerial Policy Statements in relation to the lawful activities of the agencies. Functions and responsibilities The NZSIS is a public service agency with an objective to contribute to the protection of New Zealand’s national security, the international relations and well-being of New Zealand, and the economic well-being of New Zealand. The NZSIS undertakes designated functions relevant to New Zealand's security. Th...

2. Directory of Official Information S-U [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...responsible for the intelligence and security agencies issue Ministerial Policy Statements in relation to the lawful activities of the agencies. Functions and responsibilities The NZSIS is a public service agency with an objective to contribute to the protection of New Zealand’s national security, the international relations and well-being of New Zealand, and the economic well-being of New Zealand. The NZSIS undertakes designated functions relevant to New Zealand's security. Th...

3. Directory of Official Information S-U [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...responsible for the intelligence and security agencies issue Ministerial Policy Statements in relation to the lawful activities of the agencies. Functions and responsibilities The NZSIS is a public service agency with an objective to contribute to the protection of New Zealand’s national security, the international relations and well-being of New Zealand, and the economic well-being of New Zealand. The NZSIS undertakes designated functions relevant to New Zealand's security. Th...

4. Andrews v Commissioner of Police [2013] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...the disclosure of the messages by the Police has caused him substantial emotional harm. 2 [2] This decision considers the relationship between the Privacy Act 1993 and the Criminal Disclosure Act 2008 (CDA). The former aims to promote and protect individual privacy. The latter has as its stated purpose (CDA s 3(1)) the disclosure of relevant information between the prosecution and the defence for the purposes of criminal proceedings. The Privacy Act limits the circumstances in...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 181 A Labour Inspector v New Zealand Fusion International Ltd [pdf, 299 KB]

   ...working (and the conditions under which they undertook their work). Ms Guan gave evidence that she required reports at the end of each day because she was concerned that they were taking it on themselves to do various tasks unasked and she wished to protect her assets. I do not accept that. The real reason for the requirement was to ensure that Mr Meng and Ms Xueli Wang were doing the work assigned to them. The following examples taken from “Motel work group WeChat” records...

6. Inia v Julian [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 333 (2019 APPEAL 333) [pdf, 441 KB]

   ...1993 was filed by Tui Kuikaha Julian, a child of the deceased to, in effect, have the disinherited uri restored as owners of her lands. Mrs Julian argued that Judge Hingston failed to consider the rights of the disinherited children under family protection legislation and that, as the judge had acted for the estate of the deceased’s husband, he should have recused himself because of a perception of bias. On 3 September 2018 Deputy Chief Judge Fox, while rejecting several of the ar...

7. 2021-03-23 OWRUG opening subs [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...contravention of the obligation to begin implementing the NPS FM 2020 as soon as reasonably practicable. 12. All the policy making in the world will not save the non-migratory galaxiids of Otago if the permits held to take water are not designed to protect them. It is the Otago Regional Council’s position, or so it seems, that doing nothing to that end in Otago for at least six years is an acceptable outcome. OWRUG does not agree with that proposition, because they say that w...

8. QX v ZW LCRO 134/2014 (21 October 2016) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...with this Office, challenging the Committee’s decision, and has provided extensive material in support of her application. 2 Background [4] Ms QX was married to Mr RF for 25 years. They separated in April 2006 with Ms QX retaining the care of two of the couple’s four children, who were then still living at home. [5] Ms QX has described her marriage to Mr RF as being deeply unhappy. [6] Throughout the marriage Ms QX considers that she contributed significantly more than...

9. Evaluation of Family Dispute Resolution service and mandatory self-representation [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...(Family Court Proceedings Reform Bill p.1). Two major features of the reforms that differentiate the new FJS from the previous system are: 1. The new FDR service that supports families to reach out-of-court agreements on matters like day-to-day care and contact arrangements for children 2. People who ask the Family Court to formalise a private agreement, or to settle non-urgent disputes about caring for children, are not able to use a lawyer when:  Providing their documents to the...

10. LCRO 50/2020 M and N PQ v WR (23 April 2021) [pdf, 276 KB]

    ...the Act allows a Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) to conduct the review on the basis of all information available if the LCRO considers that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. [50] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the application for review, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that neces...