4741 items matching your search terms
...guided by rr 9, 9.1, 4 I note the vendors' 6 October 2015 offer, conveyed by the vendors' lawyer, was $509,000. 5 and 9.2 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules).5 (2) Person chargeable [28] She noted that Mr CD, in his letter of engagement, had referred to the clients being [JJ], Ms AB, and Ms [EB]. In the assessor’s view, although all of Mr CD’s invoices were...
...(and other occupational groups who require professional registration to be employed in their fields), the significant consequences of dismissal, and especially, as here, of dismissal for misconduct involving allegations of dishonesty, require very careful consideration of their justification in law. [8] As this Court noted in Lewis v Howick College Board of Trustees: 2 [5] As in the cases of other professional employees whose very livelihoods are affected by a dismissal f...
...v Mitchell [2010] NZCA 385, [2010] ERNZ 446 at [20]. [21] One of the points noted in the submissions made in response by counsel for the plaintiff was that the offer required Ms Snowdon to withdraw the claim that she had made under the Protected Disclosures Act. In Bluestar, the Court of Appeal recognised that in the employment context, costs assessments were not confined solely to economic considerations. It stated: 13 We accept that there may be cases where vindication...
...pathological factors leading to a left glenohumeral osteoarthritis were initiated by a shoulder dislocation which, given Mr Prasad’s description and circumstances probably self-relocated and then settled relatively quickly so that sophisticated medical care was not sought. Then this has been aggravated by ageing changes, by the activities of daily living and by his work as a fitter engineer over the intervening many years. Nevertheless I would not consider Mr Prasad’s work ex...
...Appellant and the parent company were recorded in a contractual agreement. The goods and payments for them [10.5] The goods in issue were apparel, homeware and accessories. With minor exceptions they were only branded on labels such as size and care labels, not logos that were visible design features. [10.6] The purchase price for the goods was calculated on the basis of cost plus a loading for duty, commission payments, freight, sampling, design and a profit margin. Accordingly...
...2013, helps with the delivery of services such as immunisations, Plunket, Work and Income New Zealand and budget advisory services, as well as victim support. neighbourhood support. and probation. Transport costs, health issues and lack of chi ld care and other social services limit some people from being able to access important social and justice services. The mobile office is a joint collaboration between 13 agencies: Ministry of Justice, New Zealand Police, Department of Correct...
...taraipiunara me ngā kooti motuhake, pēnei i ēnei: – Employment Relations Authority – Kooti Taiao – Taraipiunara Arotake Tika Tangata – Legal Aid Tribunal – Kooti Whenua Māori 10 – Refugee Status Branch – Immigration and Protection Tribunal – Social Security Appeal Authority – Taxation Review Tribunal – Tenancy Tribunal. E wātea anō pea he āwhina ture mō ngā takawaenga hei whakarite wenewene tērā ka puta pea ki te kooti. Kāore te āwhi...
...$370,000. 3.2 The Committee further charges the defendant with misconduct under s.73(c) of the Act in that his conduct consist of a wilful or reckless contravention of rule 9.10 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2009. Particulars: (a) Submitting two agreements for sale and purchase to Mark Dalangin and Mark Singzon for signature without all material particulars inserted or attached to the document. 3.3 The Committee further char...
...February 2018 was in breach of Rule 6.2. The amended ASP was actually initialled by the complainants on 20 February 2019. The CAC found this back-dating to be a failure to act in good faith, to be misleading, and was also a failure to act with skill, care and competence, in breach of Rules 5.1, 6.2 and 6.4. [17] Lastly, Mr Turoa was found to have breached s 133(2) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 in that he did not provide the approved REA guide before the complainants signed...
...statements about Ms Harte that were false and to her discredit. In respect of that assertion, a compensatory remedy is sought.2 [4] Soon after filing this statement of claim, a second proceeding was initiated in the District Court. So as to protect Ms Harte’s time limitation position, a claim was commenced under the Defamation Act 1992 against two individuals, a MERAS official and a midwife. They were alleged to have made defamatory statements about her. Damages are sought....