Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 34  Xu v Pioneer Education and Immigration Services Group Ltd [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...RUIDONG’S work by: ensuring RUIDONG is operating within the scope of [his] individual knowledge and skills 7.6.2 monitoring all documentation and correspondence to clients, the Minister of Immigration, Immigration New Zealand, the Immigration and Protection Tribunal and other relevant organisations 7.6.3 maintaining oversight of RUIDONG’S handling of immigration matters [13] This agreement was signed on 11 March 2019. [14] Mr Xu considers he was a good and diligent empl...

2. Rātima v Sullivan - The Tataraakina C Trust (2015) 41 Takitimu MB 102 (41 TKT 102) [pdf, 531 KB]

   ...trust to assist in making an application for emission trading scheme units concerning their forestry assets. Mrs Huata Kupa purported to cancel this agreement per cls 5 and 6 of the trust order. 48 [87] Clause 5 of the trust order provides: Protection of Trustees In any case where any Trustee is of the opinion that any direction determination or resolution of a meeting of the Trustees or general meeting of beneficial owners conflicts or is likely to cause conflict with the te...

3. LCRO 188/2021 MC v JK and UV (19 August 2022) [pdf, 355 KB]

   ...explanation that it was agreed by Ms M’s lawyer, that Mr JK could apply the stakeholder funds towards reimbursing Mr MC for the mistaken payment to Ms M. 5 At [20]. 6 Rule 3 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules). 7 Rule 3.4 of the Rules. 8 Regulation 29 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Complaints Service and Standards Committees) Regulations 2008. 9 Section 12(1)(a) of the Act. 7 [28] The Committee c...

4. [2024] NZIACDT 17 – LB v Luv (23 May 2024) [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...a proposed application and of any mitigation or work around. [64] On the evidence before the Tribunal, the Registrar considers that Ms Luv has breached cl 1 of the Code by acting contrary to the obligation to be diligent and to exercise due care, by not realising the work experience declared with the level 6 qualification would not meet the points requirement, and not properly advising the complainant of the risk. [65] The Registrar considers that the expression had little or no...

5. Pou - Eru Moka and Te Owai Pou Whanau Trust (2013) 61 Taitokerau MB 247 (61 TTK 247) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...a general review of the trust's governance and management of its assets on behalf of the beneficial owners. Are those assets being administered in the best interests of the beneficiaries? Is the trust fulfilling its purpose as an ahu whenua (care of the land) trust, as that purpose appears from the statute (s 215, read in the light of the preamble to the Act and s 2) and from the objects stated in the trust order? ... [21] In carrying out a general review of this kind the Court oug...

6. NZCVS Cycle 3 (2020) Section 9 Perceptions of safety [xlsx, 120 KB]

   ...attribute the work to New Zealand Ministry of Justice and abide by the other licence terms. Please note you may not use any departmental or governmental emblem, logo, or coat of arms in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording “New Zealand Ministry of Justice” in your attribution, not the New Zealand Ministry of Justice logo. Data tables for NZCVS Key findings – Cycle 3 (2019/20) Section 9: Perceptions of safety mail...

7. LCRO 95/2019 CM v DL (9 March 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...2018. [14] In that correspondence, Mr CM submitted that: (a) Mr DL had breached the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008 (the Trust Account Regulations) and the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules) multiple times in his dealings with Mr CM; and (b) Mr DL had been unable to provide documentation which recorded that Mr CM had authorised him to deduct funds from monies held; and (c) Mr DL should provide evid...

8. Bristol v Ngāti Rangi Trust - Rangiwaea-Tāpiri [2017] Chief Judge's MB 269 (2017 CJ 269) [pdf, 435 KB]

   ...landscape in 1997 was different and Ngāti Rangi was growing at that time, it is the Court’s role, under s 132 of the Act, to carefully check that it has the necessary evidence and processes to ensure that long-standing customary interests are protected. It is important to appreciate the claim that Ngāti Rangi alone has the entire customary interests in this block to the exclusion of other interests of any other Whanganui group. Ngāti Rangi claims others may only have an inter...

9. NZCVS topical report Cycle 1 (2018) - Highly Victimised people [pdf, 934 KB]

   ...the work to New Zealand Ministry of Justice and abide by the other licence terms. Please note you may not use any departmental or governmental emblem, logo, or coat of arms in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording ‘New Zealand Ministry of Justice’ in your attribution, not the New Zealand Ministry of Justice logo. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/HZTYUY-NZCVS-topical-report-2018-Highly-Vic...

10. Brooking v Henderson - Wharekahika A47 (2022) 110 Tairawhiti MB 238 (110 TRW 238) [pdf, 497 KB]

    ...that the trustees at risk of removal are properly notified of that possibility; (c) in accordance with Ellis v Faulkner, the Court must assess whether a trustee has performed his or her duties “satisfactorily” which will inevitably involve a careful review of that trustee’s conduct; (d) technical breaches of terms of trust and related governance instruments may not necessarily lead to removal unless it is apparent that the assets of the trust have been put at risk or whe...