Search Results

1. Edwards – Whakatōhea (2018) 183 Waiariki MB 169-194 (183 WAR 169) [pdf, 534 KB]

   ...Claims Trust recently recognised by the Crown. There has accordingly been a plethora of evidence filed regarding the mandate of Whakatōhea. As the parties are well aware, those are live issues currently before the Waitangi Tribunal and we are careful not to encroach on that jurisdiction. [8] This application only considers mandating issues to the extent that those are relevant to the review of the s 30 order made in 1994. Background The 1994 s 30 order [9] Claude Edwards...

2. Stock v Morris - Wainui 2D2B (2012) 41 Taitokerau MB 121 (41 TTK 121) [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...ownership of the cottage so that the alterations could be done to it. By the time of the hearing the District Health Board had in fact completed the alterations and Mariao was back living in the cottage (though she has since gone into residential care). At the beginning of the hearing I asked Mary whether the application needed to proceed given that the alterations had now been done. She had no strong view either way. However, Rex’s son in-law, Roger, felt that the application...

3. Dablo v Tan [2013] NZIACDT 28 (20 May 2013) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...closed to her. Consulting a new immigration adviser [49] Ms Dablo approached another immigration adviser in January 2011. She explained that she understood there was an appeal pending, and her new adviser made inquiries with the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. On 18 January 2011 the Tribunal said Ms Dablo was not recorded in their database, so had no applications before the Tribunal. 6 Refusal to refund fees [50] Ms Dablo requested a refund of fees from the com...

4. NZCVS-Cycle-4-Core-Report-Section-10-Perceptions-of-safety-fin.pdf [pdf, 657 KB]

   ...Survey findings - Cycle 4 report Section 10 – Perceptions of safety June 2022 Results drawn from Cycle 4 (2020/21) of the New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey 2 ISSN 2744-3981 Disclaimer 1. While all care and diligence has been taken in processing, analysing, and extracting data and information for this publication, the Ministry of Justice gives no warranty that it is error free and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by the u

5. Clarke v Gray - Poukawa 9G Trust (2016) 48 Takitimu MB 182 (48 TKT 182) [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...location of the hall therefore makes its use by the Poukawa 9G Trust impractical. In addition, determination of ownership in favour of the Reservation Trust would provide certainty to all parties as to which trust is responsible for the ongoing care and maintenance of the hall. [47] For these reasons I am satisfied that an order determining the ownership of the Mangakoura Hall in favour of the Reservation Trust is appropriate. Is Hohepa Te Hoata entitled to a compensation payment?...

6. Pio v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 142 [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...He was taking Voltaren and this did improve his symptoms and by stopping work his symptoms do improve. [24] On 20 November 2015, Mr Earl performed bilateral carpal tunnel releases, stating that “the median nerve was totally decompressed and care taken to protect the recurrent branch”. [25] At review on 9 December 2015, Mr Earl noted that Mr Pio was doing very well. He stated that Mr Pio would be unable to do heavy work for the next three weeks, but was otherwise discharged fro...

7. Putataua Bay Holdings Limited v Pere - Roadway Order Instrument 7895326.1 (2015) 105 Taitokerau MB 103 (105 TTK 103) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...would have occurred prior to the 1984 roadway order being made. This partly explains Mr Pere’s reasons for obstructing the transporter trucks from driving past the pohutukawa trees and why he feels so strongly that he has a role as kaitiaki to protect Putataua Bay and these particular trees. PBH [22] PBH owns general land blocks at Putataua Bay that have a right of access over Lot 189 and areas “B” and “C” under the 2008 roadway order. The company has resource conse...

8. LCRO 73/2024 OR v SV (3 September 2024) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...respondent to believe she was the applicant’s lawyer. Despite thereby raising a potential issue of misleading conduct, the Committee expressed its opinion that the following rules of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules) applied to the complaint: (a) Rule 10.1: A lawyer must, when acting in a professional capacity, treat all persons with respect and courtesy. (b) Rule 10.3: A lawyer must not engage in conduct that amounts to: (a)...

9. Thomas v Ministry of Social Development [2024] NZHRRT 63 [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...from being induced by unfair means into supplying information which they would not otherwise have supplied. The harm is aimed at the person supplying the information, not the person the information is about.20 19 OECD Guidelines Governing the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data (adopted 23 September 1980, amended 11 July 2013). 20 Harder v Proceedings Commissioner [2000] 3 NZLR 80 (CA) at [32]. 12 [52.2] Subject to compliance with IPPs 1 and 2,21 it w...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 111 Tussock Rise Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 8.4 MB]

    ...strike out application which referred to the requirements of clause 14(1) and (2), the Council's actual argument referred to the authorities on the introductory words of clause 14. Because plan changes are usually circumscribed - often very carefully - by the party promoting them, a specific jurisprudence has sprung up about when a submission is 'on' a plan change. The word 'on' comes from the introduction to clause 14 of Schedule 1 as quoted above. The leadin...