BORA Courts and Criminal Matters Bill [pdf, 31 KB]
...141AE amount to justified limits on s 27(3) BORA. 8. In my view, the proposed exclusion of liability in those clauses is a justified limit on s 27(3) in terms of s 5 BORA: 8.1 The "no liability" clauses would only be interpreted as protecting the Crown, where the impugned conduct was not done in bad faith: Simpson v Attorney-General [Baigent's case] [1994] 3 NZLR 667 (CA); 8.2 The "no liability" clauses will only operate where the person is in serious defau...