Search Results

1. LCRO 13/2015 UP v HQ (19 June 2018) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...to be treated equally with our shareholders and he gave us no advice whatsoever during this process”. [34] It was not Mr HQ’s role to promote the interests of Mr and Mrs UP or provide them with advice. He was acting for Mr and Mrs WB. Protection of confidential information [35] All information within Mr HQ’s knowledge relating to matters involving the UPs and the WBs, was information known to all parties. There was no potential for Mr HQ to breach any duty of confidentia...

2. LCRO 104/2020 LN v RT (30 September 2020) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...disclosed, and that to the best of my knowledge, every affidavit filed with this application discloses all relevant circumstances; and 3. I am satisfied: (i) that the application and every affidavit filed with it complies with the requirements of the Care of Child Act 2004 and the Family Courts Rules 2002; and (ii) on reasonable grounds that the Order being sought falls within the grounds on which an Order can be made. [3] Although Mr LN said he had quite a number of other objectio...

3. Family Court Rewrite Submission - Isabel Aldiss [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...comprehensive literature review of CIP. We need a culturally responsive process if children are to be included in mediation. Caution is needed when involving children in the FDR process because of their vulnerability. FairWay has implemented child protection policies for all its staff and contractors. FairWay FDR process is child responsive process and is focused on child safety. This child inclusive mediation process is created by the exploration of the child’s life and the generat...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 109 V T Taueki v Horowhenua District Council [pdf, 796 KB]

   ...opinion of the court,- contravenes or is likely to contravene this Act, any regulations, a rule in a plan, a rule in a proposed plan, a requirement for a designation or for a heritage order, or a resource consent, section 10 (certain existing uses protected), or section 20A (certain existing lawful activities allowed); ... She explained that Ms Taueki's application contained two limbs. The first was protection of an archaeological site. The second was protection of sites of inte...

5. BU v YA LCRO 153 / 2010 (21 April 2011) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...damages in excess of $200,000.” [15] He alleges that this is a breach of “s11.1” being misleading or deceptive conduct, by which I take it that he is referring to Rule 11.1 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (Client Care Rules). Rule 11.1 of the Client Care Rules provides that - “A lawyer must not engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive anyone on any aspect of the lawyer’s practice.�€...

6. HB v JD LCRO 311/2013 (17 December 2014) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...of any regulations or practice rules made under [it] ...”. The conduct must “occur at a time when [the lawyer complained about] is providing regulated services”. [5] The rule HB alleged was breached is rule 10.7 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules1 which requires: A lawyer who, acting in a professional capacity, instructs another lawyer, must pay the other lawyer’s account promptly and in full unless agreement to the contrary is reached, or the fee is promptly disputed thr...

7. BORA Visiting Forces Bill [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the “Bill of Rights Act”). We understand that this Bill is to be considered by the Cabinet Legislation Committee on Thursday, 6 November 2003. 2. We consider that, taking into account the protections that will be available to service personnel under the domestic laws of States entering into a Status of Forces Agreement (a “SOFA”) with New Zealand, the Bill does not appear to be inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act....

8. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report April 2023 [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...Justice Indicators Summary Report. April 2023. Wellington: Ministry of Justice. This document is available at https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/justice- statistics/youth-justice-indicators/ Disclaimer • While all care and diligence has been taken in processing, analysing, and extracting data and information for this publication, the Ministry of Justice gives no warranty that it is error free and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by the us...

9. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report December 2020 [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...2019)…..…………………………………………………………. YJI 1.6. Proportion of children and young people referred for a youth justice Family Group Conference (FGC) who have previously been the subject of a report of concern to Oranga Tamariki relating to their care and protection Children aged 10 to 13……….……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Young people aged 14 to 17 (14 to 18...

10. [2021] NZIACDT 20 – HT v Shaikh (27 August 2021) [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...instructions to the last minute. It was acknowledged though that Mr Shaikh accepted the instructions knowing of the urgency. The complainant’s possible tardiness was not a defence to Mr Shaikh’s obligation under cl 1 to exercise diligence and due care. [28] The complainant also contributed to the problem by sending the document in the wrong format. Another unfortunate error by him was that he emailed the correct document only to a staff member (who had telephoned him earlie...