12990 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 442 APPLICANT GE RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. GE bought a T Ltd TV in December 2022 and in May 2023 it stopped working (it would not turn on). T Ltd’s representatives diagnosed it over the phone as requiring a replacement part and advised GE that they could repair it i...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 540 APPLICANT KS RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks repayment of a towing fee paid in December 2023 to release her vehicle. The parties agree the essential fac...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 122 APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT EX APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) DJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: Both claims are dismissed. Reason 1. TE and EX share a boundary. TE claims EX cut a communications cable causing damage to his home automation system including the electric gate control and lighting. EX sa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 120 APPLICANT HK Ltd RESPONDENT MO Ltd The Tribunal orders: MO Ltd is to pay $20,700.00 to HK Ltd on or before 31 August 2022; and HK Ltd is to deliver the Type B shelves to MO Ltd within one week of the above payment being made. Reasons 1. MO Ltd engaged HK Ltd to supply custom-made shelves – a price of $...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 298 APPLICANT OH RESPONDENT LT APPLICANT'S INSURER U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at the hearing. Is the respondent liable for the collision of 7 December 2022? [2] The applicant claims that on the abov...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 804 APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT GI The Tribunal orders: Application dismissed. Reasons 1. The parties own properties pursuant to a cross-lease. 2. LT has been asking GI for permission to make quite significant changes to his property. 3. It appears he is obliged to seek her permission pursuant to the cross-lease arrangements between...
...Objection noted that the applicant was due to appear next to answer the charges before the Waitakere District Court on 26 May 2014. [8] On 22 April 2014 the applicant wrote to the Authority. In her letter she said “I wish to lodge an appeal and request a hearing to have this matter adjudicated”. The Authority took this to mean that the applicant was requesting a hearing in person before the Authority pursuant to s.26(1) of the Act. [9] In a Minute dated 26 April 2014 the Authori...
...proceedings any sooner than they did, or at least they brought it within a reasonable time of first being able to. Interest will therefore be awarded for the entire period from 28 February 2020 to today, that amount being $439.51. 10. While the applicants’ claim also requests an order that interest will continue to accrue until payment is received, section 20(1) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 specifies that the Tribunal may order interest to be paid under the Interest on Money Clai...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 322 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay directly to EI the sum of $4,145.75 on or before Thursday, 16 May 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The applicant seeks half the cost of reinstating the back boundary fence after a fire at the respondent’s property and half the cost of a new boundary fence on the...
...defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DECISION: 21 December 2020 DATE OF DECISION OF COSTS: 24 November 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 [1] The Tribunal by decision in Greer v Corrections (Strike-Out Application) 2020 NZHRRT 49 struck-out Mr Greer’s claim. Mr Greer had failed to file any evidence and the claim was struck out as an abuse of process. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Greer v Corrections (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 44.]...