12990 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 636 APPLICANT LK APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT JK Ltd The Tribunal orders: The Respondent is to pay the Applicants $5,300.00 by no later than 4th October 2024. Reasons 1. The Applicants state that they made a payment following the receipt of an invoice from, what they thought, was the Respondent. The Applicants made a deposit...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 220 APPLICANT LC RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. Any applicant to the Tribunal has the task of establishing the legal and factual elements of its claim to the required evidential standard. That standard is the balance of probabilities which means what is more likely than not. 2. LC says:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 136 APPLICANT I Ltd 1ST RESPONDENT D Ltd 2ND RESPONDENT X Ltd 3RD RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 22 November 2021, I Ltd sent a parcel to its customer. The parcel was scanned into the D Ltd’s [Metropolitan facility] on 23 November 2021. 2. Due to Covid-19 lockdowns, th...
...leave to appeal against a judgment of His Honour Judge McGuire, delivered on 4 July 2022.1 The primary issue in this appeal is whether there are reviewable decisions in respect of three reviews. A related issue is whether Mr O’Neill had a valid claim for cover for his right eye injury, and, if so, whether the Corporation has failed to make a decision on that claim within the statutory time frame. Judge McGuire dismissed the appeal, for the reasons outlined below. 1 O’...
...applications lodged by Auckland Council and s274 parties; also that the Brabants were on the Court record jointly as Counsel for WML; and that as liquidator Mr Whittfield needed to resolve the question of legal representation (if any) with respect to the claims for costs. [6] Messrs Brabant fUliher recorded that Mr Whittfield had requested that the Court be advised that he had been appointed liquidator and that all further correspondence should be addressed to him (he indicated that...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1337 APPLICANT QN Limited RESPONDENT SL The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. QN Limited (Q) acted for Mr L seeking to obtain improved compensation from EQC following damage to the property owned by Mr L. Mr L obtained further compensation from EQC of $120,000. Q says $3,200 of that sum...
You can submit this file type electronically and pay any associated fee through File and Pay. On this page: General civil proceeding - recovering money or settling a dispute Judicial review - asking a judge to review the actions or decisions of a public or private administrative body Originating application Civil appeal - asking a senior court to reconsider a judge's decision Habeas corpus application - applying to have your imprisonment declared unlawful Bankruptcy application - applyin
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 323 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT KG The Tribunal orders: KG is to pay directly to D Ltd the sum of $6,412.59 on or before Wednesday, 5 June 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The parties agree the essential facts. In early 2023 the responde...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 623 APPLICANT HM RESPONDENT XD SECOND RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: 1. XD and KT must return E to HM by 4pm on 4 December 2023 at a time and place that is reasonably agreed by all parties. 2. If E is not returned to HM in accordance with paragraph 1 above, XD and KT must pay HM $2,000.00 by 4pm on 11 December 2023. R...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 544 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT NO The Tribunal orders: NO also known as [redacted] is to pay NC the sum of $4,249.50 immediately. Reasons The telephone hearing for this application was held 11 September 2023 at 9.15am. The respondent NO had been notified of the hearing but failed to atten...