12990 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1386 APPLICANT ZG Limited RESPONDENT KJ Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: KJ Limited is to pay ZG Limited $270.95 by Friday 20 March 2020. Reasons 1. The parties entered into a contract whereby KJ Limited (KJL) was to update ZG Limited’s (ZGL) its website to get a higher google search ranking. ZGL says t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 156 APPLICANT EL RESPONDENT BN The Tribunal orders: BN is to pay $1040.00 to EL on or before 21 October 2022. Reasons 1. EL is a builder that carried out work at the property belonging to BN and his now-ex-partner DN to prepare it for sale. EL was initially approached by the real estate agent for the property and he p...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1562 APPLICANT BT FIRST RESPONDENT SM SECOND RESPONDENT CI THIRD RESPONDENT KS FOURTH RESPONDENT UE The Tribunal orders: 1. All parties are to sign a joint bond refund form by 5 August 2021 for the bond of $1,240.00 to be distributed by the Bond Centre as follows: a. BT $300.00...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 269 APPLICANT KL APPLICANT KC RESPONDENT EJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: EJ Ltd must pay KL and KC $4,262.00 by 4pm on 24 January 2023. Reasons: 1. The applicants ordered a television unit from the respondent on 13 January 2022 and paid a 50% deposit of $4,262.00. The estimated delivery time for the unit was 1...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1694 APPLICANT EF RESPONDENT UM The Tribunal orders: UM is to pay $30,000.00 to EF on or before Friday 29 October 2021. Reasons: 1. In May 2019, EF and UM signed an Agreement to Purchase. The header page named “[Company 1] or nominee company” and “EF or nominee” as the parties. The agreement set out “act...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 723 BETWEEN DM APPLICANT AND VN TRUSTEES LIMITED RESPONDENT Date of Order: 31 October 2014 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that VN Trustees Limited as trustee of AA is to pay the sum of $6,182.40 directly to DM trading as ABC on or before 28 November 2014 and the counter claim is dismissed. Facts [1] DM, trading as ABC, was engaged by VN T...
Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) RESULT OF APPLICATION FOR REHEARING [2023] NZDT 557 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim ED RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against MA Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Granted The Order of 18 April 2023 is set aside. In due course the parties will be advised of the date and time of the new hearing. Reasons for decision: 1...
.................................................................................................................................. 3 Grounds for Review ................................................................................................................. 4 APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW ................................................................................................ 5 Applications ...............................................................................................
...and he did not know about it. The issue in relation to the provision of false documents is whether the Tribunal can uphold such a complaint which failed at trial in a prosecution. [3] It is also alleged Mr Wong entered information onto a blank application form already signed by a client, before filing the application with Immigration New Zealand. Mr Wong denies doing so, contrary to an admission he made to the Authority. He declined to attend the Tribunal’s hearing of the com...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 208 APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT SD Ltd The Tribunal orders: SD Ltd is to pay SX $600.00 by 8 December 2022. Reasons: 1. In July 2022, SX rented a cabin from SD Ltd. She says the cabin had a chemical odour and was not fit for purpose. She claims a refund of all money paid for the cabin, as well as furniture removal costs....