12990 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 6 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: NQ is to pay N Ltd the sum of $990.15 by no later than 15 March 2024. Reasons: 1. The matter arises from NQ’s shopping trolley (full of groceries) hitting a parked car owned by N Ltd in a supermarket car park. 2. The respondent has been amended to reflect that NQ should be...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 107 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT OQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] B Ltd, represented by director CX, claims from OQ the expenses incurred by B Ltd in research and development regarding a machine that OQ required. B Ltd did not succeed in its attempts to design and make a machine in accordance with the needs of O...
...LCRO 207/2011 LCRO 208/2011 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Canterbury-Westland Standards Committee 3 BETWEEN TA Applicant AND NC NB Respondent The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The Standards Committee declined to uphold a number of complaint...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 463 APPLICANT SH RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Was the service provided by the respondent carried out with reasonable care and skill and fit for purpose? 1. The Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 provides that services carried out by suppliers come with guarantees of reasonable care and skill and fit...
...Directed by the Adjudicator under clause 1 of Schedule 1 of the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 This practice direction sets out the policy and procedures of the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal (MVDT) about the information that needs to be included with your application. What we need when you send your application to the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal You must provide the following information: A clearly written and completed Application Form, The name and the address of the motor vehicle trader...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 59 APPLICANT IO RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. D Ltd will register the car in IO’s name at its own cost. 3. IO is to collect his car on or before 5pm on 13 March 2024. If he does not collect the car D Ltd can dispose of it in any manner it sees fit but IO is not entitled to a refun...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 105 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT DE SECOND RESPONDENT UC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DI brings a claim regarding an agreement to purchase UC in 2018 from DE. A deposit of $52,577.80 was made. He states that he requested that five years of financial statements were to be provided...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 744 APPLICANT CQ SECOND APPLICANT LM THIRD APPLICANT OL RESPONDENT JT The Tribunal orders: 1. From 22 January 2024, CQ may undertake work to build a boundary fence which shall be constructed along the driveway on the boundary between [Address 1] and [Address 2]. This work will include the removal of the current fence....
...fees cannot be ordered. These are costs which the Tribunal is unable to order under section 43 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 Did OB Ltd provide its service with reasonable care and skill? 3. NG has claimed that OB Ltd failed to provide services with reasonable care and skill. The Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 provides guarantees for consumers that services will be provided with reasonable care and skill. NG’s belief is that the resc...
...as having taken over the legal obligation of the company that signed the collective agreement, TLNZ Ltd. The union relied either on the doctrine of estoppel or the lifting of the corporate veil to obtain the relief it sought in its statement of claim, namely a finding that C3 is the employer party to the collective agreement. [2] Following the conclusion of the hearing counsel were agreed that further submissions would be filed on two issues: the principles that apply to the lif...