Search Results

1. Connors - Rakautaua 1B2A2 (2007) 180 Aotea MB 242 (180 AOT 242) [pdf, 825 KB]

   180 Aotea MB 242 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: A20060008047 A20050010539 UNDER Sections 133, 135 and 151 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rakautaua 1B2A2 MARK AND RAYMOND CONNORS Applicants 15 November 2005 161 Aotea MB 191-193 14 March 2006 167 Aotea MB 179-188 11 April 2006 169 Aotea MB 121-135 12 June 2006 171 Aotea MB 61 22 August 2006 176 Aotea MB 1 17 October 2006 177 Aotea MB 285 23 January 2007 Appearances: Mr M R...

2. SK and RM v GJ LCRO 36/2015 (14 December 2016) [pdf, 252 KB]

   LCRO 36/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN SK and RM Applicants AND GJ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr SK and Mr RM (the lawyers) have applied to review a decision of [City] Standards Commit...

3. Maxwell - 313 Parish of Waimana (2020) 239 Waiariki MB 27 (239 WAR 27) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...Waiariki District A20200005863 WĀHANGA Under Sections 37, 67, 93, 231, 236 and 237, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Section 313 Parish of Waimana TE KAHAUTU MAXWELL Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 4 August 2020 (Judicial conference at Hamilton) Kanohi kitea: Appearances K Katipo for Applicant Te rā: Date 12 August 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ L R HARVEY...

4. [2012] NZEmpC 142 Horton Media Ltd [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...invited the Court to conclude that procedural failings on the part of the defendant were not sufficient to render the dismissal unjustified. [5] In its determination, 2 the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) rejected Mr Hooper’s claim. In this proceeding, Mr Hooper has challenged the whole of that determination de novo. Background [6] Mr Hooper is 37 years of age. At the time of his dismissal he had been working for Coca-Cola for approximately 18 years having...

5. Storie & Raynes v CAC10057 & Barlow [2012] NZREADT 7 [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...1 July 2010. It recorded that Mrs Barlow was to incur costs to move out of her property on 1 July 2010 and that Mr Storie and Ms Raynes had agreed to meet half of her storage costs ($843.75). Unfortunately this was not paid promptly. Mrs Barlow claimed that she was told that she would be paid by 30 June 2010. The money was eventually paid in two amounts - $200 on 12 July 2010 and a further $643.75 on 2 September 2010. [3] In August Mrs Barlow complained to the REAA. The Complaints...

6. Bogusz v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Entitlements) [2022] NZACC 157 [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...[Suspension of entitlements s 117 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] This is an appeal against a decision of the respondent of 18 January 2021 suspending entitlements in respect of claim 10048361893. [2] In its decision of 18 January 2021, ACC said: Your current condition is no longer the result of your personal injury of 25/09/2019. ACR 259/21 Background [3] On 25 September 2019, the appellant injured him...

7. Brighton v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 65 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...overseas bank accounts. [38] Accordingly, in its decision upholding this complaint the Tribunal gave Mr Standing notice that if there was an issue relating to his ability to pay, he should provide information that allowed the Tribunal to evaluate the claim with regard to the funds which had not been accounted for. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the Tribunal would proceed on the basis Mr Standing had the means to meet financial sanctions that fully reflect the findings agai...

8. Balich v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 64 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...overseas bank accounts. [38] Accordingly, in its decision upholding this complaint the Tribunal gave Mr Standing notice that if there was an issue relating to his ability to pay, he should provide information that allowed the Tribunal to evaluate the claim with regard to the funds which had not been accounted for. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the Tribunal would proceed on the basis Mr Standing had the means to meet financial sanctions that fully reflect the findings agai...

9. LCRO 42/2021 JKL Limited v HC and GD (30 August 2021) [pdf, 277 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 141 Ref: LCRO 42/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN JKL LIMITED Applicant AND HC and GD Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introductio...

10. Rzoska - Estate of Hineawe [2012] Chief Judge's MB 107 (2012 CJ 107) [pdf, 391 KB]

    ...THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT (2012 Chief Judge's MB 107) (2012 CJ 107) A20070009777 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hineawe BETWEEN HAIMONA TE IKI RZOSKA Applicant Hearing: 9 December 2010, 2010 Chief Judge's MB 446 (Heard at Whanganui) Judgment: 23 April 2012 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE WW ISAAC 2012 Chief Judge’s MB 108 Introduction [1]...