Search Results

1. [2015] NZSSAA 001 (13 February) [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...debt was returned to the Authority for reconsideration apparently on the basis that the Authority did not have before it information about the appellant’s circumstances and financial situation. This was despite the Authority having specifically requested the appellant to provide this information. [5] The appellant has now had a further opportunity to provide submissions to the Authority on the issue of whether or not the debt should be recovered. [6] The debt relating to Accommo...

2. Director of Proceedings v Nelson Marlborough District Health Board [2014] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...annexed and marked “A”. [3] The Consent Memorandum is in the following terms: MAY IT PLEASE THE TRIBUNAL 1. The plaintiff and defendant have agreed upon a summary of facts, a signed copy of which is filed with this memorandum. 2. The plaintiff requests that the Tribunal exercise its jurisdiction in respect of the following matters: (a) A declaration pursuant to s 54(1)(a) of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 (“the Act”) that the defendant has breached the Heal...

3. Cabinet Minute Strategic Approach to Support the Response to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...ensure consistency with the principles, the Crown’s legal approach should be exploratory, seeking to balance the Crown’s legal obligations with the principles; 12 directed officials to consider whether the approach to the conduct of current historic claims litigation could better reflect the proposed principles, and report back to SWC by the end of October 2019; 13 noted that, as a first step to demonstrate the proposed principles, the Minister for State Services will proactively rel...

4. Worsnop v Lux - Ruarakai-Tokomanawa Lands Trust (2015) 117 Waiariki MB 26 (117 WAR 26) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20130009112 A20130003558 UNDER Sections 237, 238 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF RUARAKAI-TOKOMANAWA LANDS TRUST BETWEEN ANI WORSNOP KEPA RAUKAWA FRANK TE WHEKI PORTER Applicants AND DANIEL LUX Respondent Hearing: 1 July 2013, 77 Waiariki MB 284-286 2 April 2014, 95 Waiariki MB 255-312 7 August 2014, 102 Waiariki MB 263-268 1 October 2014, 105 Waiariki MB 153-162 (Heard at Opot...

5. [2021] NZEmpC 160 Wilson v Manukau Institute of Technology [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 160 EMPC 24/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out part of the proceedings AND IN THE MATTER of an application to exclude evidence BETWEEN BRIAN WILSON Plaintiff AND MANUKAU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Defendant Hearing: Sub...

6. Nepia v Fox - Estate of Mereana Totoru Mita Nepia (2006) 112 Wairoa 82 (112 WR 82) [pdf, 174 KB]

   Minute Book: 112 WR 82 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI A20030004059 UNDER Section 118, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Hearing: Judgment: Application IN THE MATTER OF Mereana Totoru Mita Nepia BETWEEN DAVID GARY NEPIA Applicant AND 2 February 2005 (Heard at Wairoa) 12 September 2006 DEREK FOX Respondent DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC [l] This is an application by David Gary Nepia pursuant to section 118 ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 154 NEIL Construction Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   ...I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BElWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 15 4- of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for declarations under s311 of the Act NEIL CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-000053) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent MINISTER OF DEFENCE Second Respondent L O LEE, S C LIN & S C CHEN Section 27 4 Par...

8. 2021-03-15 D-G of Conservation opening subs [pdf, 246 KB]

   .......................................................... 4 Otago’s endemic freshwater fishes – non-diadromous Galaxias taxa ........................ 5 Legal matters relevant to the Court’s consideration ................................................. 5 Deemed permits and the continued application of priorities under the RMA .............. 6 Fish passage, the NPSFM and the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1983 .............. 8 The Director-General’s submission and relief ........

9. AAE v ZZV [2012] NZDT 32 (18 May 2012) [pdf, 66 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 32 BETWEEN AAE APPLICANT AND ZZV RESPONDENT Date of Order: 18 May 2012 Referee: Referee Edison ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZZV Towing Company Ltd shall pay AAE the sum of $250.00 by 4pm on 1 June 2012. Facts [1] In the evening of 26 November 2012, AAE had dinner in the food court of the XY Plaza. AA...

10. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Johnson [2022] NZLCDT 32 (7 September 2022) [pdf, 83 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 32 LCDT 022/21 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND RONALD BRUCE JOHNSON Respondent CHAIR Ms D Clarkson appearing by VMR MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr G McKenzie Ms S Sage Ms S Stuart Ms P Walker HEARING 29 August 2022 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Auckland DATE OF...