Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12990 items matching your search terms

  1. NC v KD & CD [2024] NZDT 535 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 535 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT KD and CD The Tribunal orders: KD and CD are to pay $351.50 to NC by 10 August 2024. Reasons Was the advertisement for the Cottage misleading? 1. NC booked KD and CD’s Cottage for four nights of accommodation. KD and CD’s advertisement stated that the Cottage was in a “peaceful rural settin...

  2. J. Kim v K. E. H. Kim [2016] NZIACDT 32 (22 June 2016) [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...the complainant a copy of the Code of Conduct in the course of the client engagement process; [3.2] How she managed the application signed in blank. She accepts she did use that process. However, she says she referred the completed and pre-signed form to the complainant for approval before sending it to Immigration New Zealand; and, [3.3] She disputes the nature and extent of the advice she gave after the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully. [4] After making findings on the disp...

  3. [2011] NZEmpC 169 Kim v Thermosash Commercial Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...169 [14 December 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 169 ARC 54/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out the claim BETWEEN WILSON KIM Plaintiff AND THERMOSASH COMMERCIAL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18 November 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Plaintiff in person Jenni-Marie Trotman and Jo Douglas, counsel for defenda...

  4. NM v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 393 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 165 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 393 APPLICANT NM RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. The dispute is about a [luxury brand] cashmere jumper NM purchased and whether pilling after 5 or 6 wears is sufficient to show it is not of acceptable quality. NM is seeking a refund of the $699.00 purchase price. 2....

  5. NM v BU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1580 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out o...

  6. LO v SD [2021] NZDT 1388 (3 July 2019) [pdf, 222 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1388 APPLICANT LO RESPONDENT SD The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Ms O and Ms D were friends when Ms O approached Ms D for help accessing cheap flights to [Country A]. Ms O's son was getting married and the whole family was travelling to [Country A] for the wedding. Ms O knew that...

  7. IO v TH Ltd [2024] NZDT 151 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...provided quotes or estimates showing costs of $900.00 plus GST to remove the substandard film, $1,026.04 to repair the bumper, and $4,366.60 to repair the console and mirror. 7. The total sum including the refund comes to well over the $5,500.00 claimed, but IO cannot recover more than the amount of his claim. I have therefore ordered payment of $5,500.00. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 26 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings Y...

  8. P Ltd v UC [2024] NZDT 384 (29 May 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 384 APPLICANT P Ltd RESPONDENT UC The Tribunal orders: UC is to pay P Ltd $2,158.51 on or before 19 June 2024. Reasons 1. In or around November 2018, UC asked P Ltd to complete some repair work on a boat. P Ltd completed the work and invoiced UC. UC did not pay. The account was referred to P Ltd’s debt collectors but when...

  9. DD v SQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 72 (31 January 2022) [pdf, 129 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 72 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT SQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. SQ Ltd has left open its offer to reimburse the cost of paint it has supplied for painting her house and to supply a further two litres of white paint. It will be up to DD as to whether she accepts that offer. Background...

  10. Criminal Fixed Fee schedules 2018 updated 5 October 2023 [pdf, 499 KB]

    ...client • receiving, reviewing and/or preparing disclosure • identifying legal and factual issues • undertaking research • reviewing evidence (including videos/DVDs) • liaising with prosecutor/court • identifying the need for applications, interlocutories etc. • entering plea • any agent fees • reporting to client. - when additional charges are added to the legal aid grant * $90 Charge discussions $120 • engaging in charge discussions and/or...