12972 items matching your search terms
LCRO 55/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Auckland Standards Committee 5 BETWEEN Mr JD Applicant AND Mr RU Respondent DECISION Background [1] Mr JD is the father of a child victim of an indecent act by an adult. Mr RU acted for the accused. [2] The incidents out of which Mr JD’s complaints arise took place at the [...
...Consent Memorandum is in the following terms: MAY IT PLEASE THE TRIBUNAL 1. The plaintiff and defendant have agreed upon a summary of facts, a signed copy of which is filed with this memorandum, together with an anonymised copy. 2. The plaintiff requests that the Tribunal exercises its jurisdiction and issues: (a) A declaration pursuant to section 54(1)(a) of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 ("the Act") that the defendant has breached the Health and Disability C...
LCRO 44/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN JJ Applicant AND IO, UZ & [Law Firm A] (now [Law Firm D]) Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] JJ (Ms JJ) has applied for a review of a decision by the [Are...
...overseas bank accounts. [38] Accordingly, in its decision upholding this complaint the Tribunal gave Mr Standing notice that if there was an issue relating to his ability to pay, he should provide information that allowed the Tribunal to evaluate the claim with regard to the funds which had not been accounted for. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the Tribunal would proceed on the basis Mr Standing had the means to meet financial sanctions that fully reflect the findings agai...
...overseas bank accounts. [38] Accordingly, in its decision upholding this complaint the Tribunal gave Mr Standing notice that if there was an issue relating to his ability to pay, he should provide information that allowed the Tribunal to evaluate the claim with regard to the funds which had not been accounted for. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the Tribunal would proceed on the basis Mr Standing had the means to meet financial sanctions that fully reflect the findings agai...
1 IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0068-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN P J & S J Applicant AND HOLLOWAY BUILDERS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) First Respondent AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Second Respondent AND QBE AUSTRALIA LIMITED Third Respondent AND HFC CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL (SOUTH) LIMITED Fourth Respondent (REMOVED) A...
...AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 240. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 9 LCDT 001/21 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND HELEN HOLLAND Respondent DEPUTY CHAIR Judge J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms A Callinan Ms M Noble Ms G Phipps Ms S Stuart HEARING 14 and 15 February 2022 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals...
...Ministers of the Crown and officials; and • section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions; and • section 9(2)(h) to maintain legal professional privilege. 4. Reforms to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 Cabinet Minute CAB-22-MIN- 0457.02 Cabinet Office 25 October 2022 Some information has been withheld in accordance with section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventi...
...Under Sections 18, 133, 165, 220, 241, 315 and 316, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Huruhi 12B Block I WAENGA I A Between GARETH NEWTON, JUSTINE NEWTON AND RAYMOND NEWTON Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And ERIN ASHMORE Te kaiurupare tuatahi First Respondent ME And SHARON WATENE AND PHYLLIS HEMI AS TRUSTEES OF TE HURUHI 12B TRUST Te kaiurupare tuarua Second respondent Nohoanga: Hearing...
...decision imposes sanctions, following a decision upholding a complaint against Ms Devi in [2014] NZIACDT 33. [2] The Tribunal found the complainant sought the Ms Devi’s assistance as he considered he needed professional support to complete his application. The adviser wholly failed to engage with Immigration New Zealand’s concerns when they raised issues around the apparent inconsistencies between the applications lodged by her and that which had previously been lodged by the complai...