12972 items matching your search terms
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 16 EMPC 116/2017 IN THE MATTER OF an application for further orders to impose a fine BETWEEN JASON NATHAN Applicant AND BROADSPECTRUM (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED (FORMERLY TRANSFIELD SERVICES LIMITED) Respondent Hearing: Wellington, 9 November 2017 Appearances: T Cleary, counsel for applicant A Lloyd and J Hardacre, counsel for respondent Judgment: 12 March 2018...
ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency SUBMISSIONS FOR MUAŪPOKO TRIBAL AUTHORITY ON CULTURAL CONDITIONS 17...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 41 LCDT 030/13 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 3 Applicant AND BOON HONG Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Mr A Lamont Mr P Shaw Mr S Walker HEARING at Auckland DATE OF HEARING 30 June 2014 COUNSEL Mr P Collins for the Auckland Standards...
...relies on the discretion contained in s 63(a) of the Social Security Act 1964 to treat a married person as single for benefit purposes. [17] Section 63 of the Social Security Act 1964 gives the Chief Executive a discretion to regard as single any applicant or beneficiary who is married or in a civil union but is living apart from his or her spouse or partner. The decision under s 63 is a two-part process. In the first instance, it must be determined whether or not the beneficiary is li...
...in the PDP. The Site is legally described as Sec 2 of 5, Blk XIV, Lower Wanaka Survey District (CT OT18C/473). 4 [2] The approximately 50.7 ha Site is part of an elevated ridge, being a remnant glacial moraine deposit from ice scours that formed Lakes Hāwea and Wānaka. Some 25 ha of the Site, facing Lake Wānaka, is included in a large Outstanding Natural Landscape (‘ONL’) that the PDP planning maps show as extending across Lake Wānaka and its Rural-zoned environs. Th...
...Auckland”: FYI, on Monday Guy’s trial commences in Auckland... There may well be some publicity about this and I wanted you to be aware as such in advance…. … Some clients may also raise this in discussions with you. Again you are requested not to comment. The matter is before the courts, Guy is entitled to a fair trial, is innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt and it is not appropriate to comment in the circumstances. 9 During this period Mr Hallw...
...further account of these events was consistent with his evidence-in-chief. He also denied telling Mr Murray that he did not have a future at the restaurant or that he no longer had a job. Discussion and decision [15] Mr Murray’s claim is that he was unjustifiably dismissed in the course of his conversation with Mr Blunden on the morning of 17 May 2006. In pursuing that claim, the initial onus lies on Mr Murray to establish on the balance of probabilities that he...
...reserved for any party by 16 November 2018 to advise the court on notice if an issue raised in that party's submissions has not been considered and resolved or if the court has misunderstood the "reflectivity" issue; (2) If any application is made under (1) , then Order B is automatically suspended. D: Costs are reserved. REASONS o. Introduction [1] On 11 May 2018 the Environment Court issued a Consent Order in these proceedings in which it approved (inter ali...
...of sex because of the way they are paid under the collective agreement. A striking feature of the proceeding is that the alleged discrimination arises from the collective agreement itself and not from the conduct of any of the defendants. The claims are made under the Equal Pay Act 1972, the Government Service Equal Pay Act 19601 and the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). 1 Now repealed as from 6 November 2020 by s 34 of the Equal Pay Amendment Act 2020. [3] T...
...charges against Mr Mairs alleged1 that the defendant’s conduct was disgraceful for being a deliberate and dishonest breach of the security of the property – (a) he obtained the key to the property under false pretences, namely by falsely claiming that he had a potential buyer that he intended to show through the property; (b) he entered and remained overnight at the property without the express permission of the clients; (c) he used the facilities at the property, including...