Search Results

1. Larkin - Wairau North 2F1 (2008) 124 Whangarei MB 90 (124 WH 90) [pdf, 987 KB]

   ...OF Hearing: 14 March 2008 (Heard at Kaikohe) Judgment: 31 March 2008 124 Whangarei MB 90 A20070007918 A20070007919 Section 328, Te TureWhenua Act 1993 Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Act 1993 Wairau North 2Fl HILDA FRANCIS LARKIN Applicant RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Introduction [1] The Court has before it applications by Hilda Larkin pursuant to section 18(1)(a) ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 ("the Act) to conflnn ownership of a dwelling on Wairau...

2. Family Court (Family Court Associates) Legislation Bill [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...16 (attend a parenting programme). 2 Clause 15. 3 Clause 21. 2 6889243_FAMILY COURT (FAMILY COURT ASSOCIATES) LEGISLATION BILL New Zealand where there are reasonable grounds to believe a person is intending to defeat certain specified applications 6. Amendments to the Family Violence Act 2018 authorise a Family Court Associate to hear and decide objections to a direction to undertake an assessment for a non-violence programme or to attend such a programme or engage with a p...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 024 CSF Trustees v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Lakes District Council S Pierce for S R F Knowles as a section 274 party Date of Decision: 15 February 2019 Date of Issue: 15 February 2019 PROCEDURAL DECISION A: The appeal is struck out under section 279(4) RMA. B: Costs are reserved. Any application should be made within ten working days of issue of this decision. REASONS CSF TRUSTEES l TO v QlDC - PROCEDURAL DECISION 2 Introduction [1] On 2 November 2018 Mrs S R F Knowles applied under section 279(4) of the Resour...

4. [2021] NZREADT 52 - QH v KE, SE & Agency (14 October 2021) [pdf, 299 KB]

   ...respondent. [2] QH made a complaint to the Real Estate Agents Authority (the Authority), the first respondent. A Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC 2103) decided on 8 June 2021 that the listing of the properties included false and misleading information. However, KE and SE had not misled QH as he would have been aware of the true state of the property when the sale became unconditional. Accordingly, the Committee decided to take no further action. QH appeals against that dec...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 74 Tairawhiti District Health Board v NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...Judgment: 14 June 2016 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN Nature of case [1] This judgment decides a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority 1 about a disputed question of the interpretation, operation and application of a Multi-Employer Collective Agreement (a MECA). It deals, in particular, with questions of status, seniority and salary steps where relevant employees move between employers covered by the same collective agreement....

6. [2021] NZEmpC 66 Smartlift Systems Ltd v Armstrong [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...compensation which should be awarded under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act?2 The Authority’s determination [3] Given the issues just referred to, I summarise the key points of the determination. [4] The Authority recorded that Mr Armstrong and Mr Haika claimed that Smartlift had dismissed them unjustifiably when undertaking a restructuring process. Amongst their complaints was an assertion that the employer’s consultation was flawed.3 [5] Smartlift denied these allegations. I...

7. Auckland Standards Committee v Sorensen [2012] NZLCDT 23 [pdf, 140 KB]

   IN THE NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2012] NZLCDT 23 LCDT 014/10 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND HANS TIMOTHY SORENSEN of Auckland, Lawyer Respondent CHAIR Mr D J Mackenzie MEMBERS OF THE TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Mr M Gough Mr A Lamont Mr C Rickit REPRESENTATION Ms J McCartney SC for Auckland Standards Committ...

8. LCRO 212/2015 KC v MZ (24 August 2018) [pdf, 115 KB]

   LCRO 212/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN KC Applicant AND MZ Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr KC has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) to tak...

9. Wellington Standards Committee v Twigley [2016] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 601 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 37 LCDT 019/16 UNDER the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND CHRISTOPHER TWIGLEY Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr J Bishop Mr W Chapman Mr M Gough Mr A Marshall HEARING at Wellington Tribunals DATE OF HEARING 2 and 3 November 2016 DATE OF DECISION 19 Decembe...

10. Mau Whenua Incorporated - Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust (2020) 419 Aotea MB 112 (419 AOT 112) [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...matter of Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust I WAENGA I A Between MAU WHENUA INCORPORATED, WHAREHURU GILBERT, MARTHA HINEONE GILBERT, KAREN MARAMA PARATA, MABEL URU TANIRAU AND ROGAN RAWIRI HAHOPE TANIRAU Ngā kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearing 8 April 2020, 414 Aotea MB 78-80 16 June 2020, 417 Aotea MB 110 1 July 2020, 417 Aotea MB 258-265 29 July 2020, 418 Aotea MB 207-208 (Heard at Wellington) Kanohi kitea: Appearances R Pinn...