Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12993 items matching your search terms

  1. OIA-98286.pdf [pdf, 135 KB]

    Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 2 September 2022 Our ref: OIA 98286 Tēnā koe Official Information Act 1982 request: Advice provided to Tenancy Tribunal Adjudicators Thank you for your email of 11 August 2022, requesting information on any advice provided to Tenancy Tribunal (the Tribunal) adjudicators with respect to handling meth related claims...

  2. [2012] NZEmpC 143 George v Auckland Council [pdf, 131 KB]

    ...predecessor, the Auckland Regional Council (ARC). Team allegedly provided to Ms George two opinions on taxation matters which it is alleged she did not disseminate and which led to the AC incurring substantial taxation liability. These matters form the basis of the damages claim against her. Ms George in her affidavits contended that there are documents, or classes of documents, which she has requested and which have not yet been disclosed by the AC. [5] In broad terms, Ms Ge...

  3. KB & PB v VI Ltd & OQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 144 (16 August 2022) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...RESPONDENT VI Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT OQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. VI Ltd is to pay PB and KB the sum of $8,226.74 on or before 6 September 2022. 2. The claim against OQ Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. [The applicants] purchased a property and moved into it in October 2021. The previous owners had had some building and plumbing work carried out in the bathroom, in August 2021 while the house was empty and ready for sale. When [the applicants] moved i...

  4. Q Ltd v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 659 (30 November 2023) [pdf, 126 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 659 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. F Ltd is to pay $16,339.20 to Q Ltd on or before 12 January 2024. Reasons: 2. In September 2021, the Respondent placed an order with the Applicant for the manufacture and supply of [a louvre roof] for installation at a client’s address. A quote in the amount of $16,891...

  5. Cookson-Ua v Cookson-Ua - Succession to Te Waharoa Cookson Ua (2020) 64 Te Waipounamu MB 2 (64 TWP 2) [pdf, 264 KB]

    ...Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Te Waharoa Matenga Cookson Ua – Rehearing of application (A20180005000) I WAENGA I A Between KERE TROY COOKSON UA AND CORRINE RHIND-COOKSON Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And MARNIA ANGELINE COOKSON UA AND TEREWAI LEE COOKSON UA Ngā kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 11 September 2018, 51 Te Waipounamu MB 288-291 9 July 2019, 57 Te Waipounamu 89 13 August 2...

  6. Goold [2011] NZWHT Auckland 42 [pdf, 90 KB]

    1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 42 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6589: JOHN AND LYNN GOOLD – 1 KELVIN CRESCENT, TE ATATU PENINSULA ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] John and Lynn Goold are the owners of a leaky home. They filed a claim with the Department of Building a...

  7. EN & UN v DW [2022] NZDT 24 (28 March 2022) [pdf, 180 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 24 APPLICANT EN and UN and KQ Ltd RESPONDENT DW The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. EN, UN and KQ Ltd as trustees of the KN Trust (the Trustees) owned the property next door to DW. Trees were cut down at the property and the fence damaged. The Trustees were marketing the property after th

  8. TL v TF Ltd [2024] NZDT 755 (29 August 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 755 APPLICANT TL RESPONDENT TF Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 8 November 2023, TL contracted TF Ltd (herein TF) to move her household goods from [Town] to [City] on 2 December 2023 for $1,710.00. 2. The booking was made via [an online platform], which allows customers to chose from multiple part...

  9. X Ltd v GN [2023] NZDT 446 (4 September 2023) [pdf, 174 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

  10. [2017] NZEnvC 152 Auckland Council v Chen Hong Co Ltd [pdf, 395 KB]

    ...Jiawen Mao and Ee Kuoh Lau (Augustine Lau) jointly and severally. [2] The Interim Decision was subject to the rider that before the Court finally made the costs award the Council was to provide invoices pertaining to legal and witness costs which formed the bulk of the claim. Such invoices had not been included in the documents supporting the costs claim. [3] The Council has now lodged the requested invoices with the Court, together with an explanatory memorandum. I have examined...