Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Strategic Direction 2014-2025 [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...by Lithoprint Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand Illustrations Page iv : Tribunal chairperson Chief Judge Wilson Isaac Page v : Waitangi Tribunal Unit acting director Julie Tangaere Page vi : The Waitangi Tribunal, March 2014 Page 2 : Mangatū remedies claim hearing, Te Poho-o-Rāwiri Marae, Gisborne, June 2012 Page 5 : Cover of Ko Aotearoa Tēnei : A Report into Claims Concerning New Zealand Law and Policy Affecting Māori Culture and Identity, Te Taumata Tuatahi Page 6 : Cover of The...

2. AM v JO Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 496 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 496 APPLICANT AM RESPONDENT JO Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT MA THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT TA The Tribunal orders: 1. JO Ltd is to pay AM the sum of $2,000.00 on or before 25 June 2024. 2. The claim against MA and TA is dismissed. Reasons: 1. AM brought this claim against JO LtdJO LTD for $7,225.00 on the basis that h...

3. BE v YV [2014] NZDT 558 (22 May 2014) [pdf, 65 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 558 BETWEEN BE APPLICANT AND YV RESPONDENT Date of Order: 22 May 2014 Referee: Referee Paton-Simpson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed Reasons [1] On 25 February 2011, BE paid $20,000.00 into the bank account of ABC Ltd (ABC) by way of a loan. At that time he was employed by ABC, and his friend YV was director of ABC. He also paid over $13...

4. Tabram v Slater [pdf, 19 KB]

   ...respondents’ application for costs was dismissed in the Tribunal’s substantive decision, this determination is based on the remaining costs applications by the second respondent (Ojo Limited) and fourth respondent (Mineral Plaster Technologies Limited). Claims for Costs Application by Ojo Limited (Ojo) Ojo applied for costs against the claimants and the second respondents (Slaters) on the following grounds: • The claim by the Slaters that they relied on Ojo’s plans and specifi...

5. BH v YS and YSY [2013] NZDT 430 (21 March 2013) [pdf, 193 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 430 BETWEEN BH APPLICANT AND YS RESPONDENT AND YSY SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 21 March 2013 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the case is struck out for lack of jurisdiction and referred to the Tenancy Tribunal This order is made in the absence of the first respondent and pursuant to section 42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act...

6. BC v TH Ltd [2024] NZDT 658 (16 August 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 658 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT TH Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks compensation following the supply and installation of a solar system in her house bus in 2021. The solar system as ins...

7. UL v PT [2022] NZDT 276 (23 December 2022) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 276 APPLICANT UL RESPONDENT PT The Tribunal orders: 1. PT is to pay to UL the sum of $375.00 on or before 10 February 2023. Reasons 1. UL rented a room in PT’s home. When he left, PT held onto the bond of $400.00. UL filed a claim seeking the return of the bond, plus costs ($600.00). PT sought cleaning costs and repa...

8. BR v YD LCRO 64 / 2011 (9 May 2011) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...following:- (a) That he was not aware of the increases in the Respondent’s hourly charge-out rates; (b) that the Respondent had previously failed to file and follow-up with the Courts to ensure filing had been processed in time; (c) that he had requested that the Applicant cease work on the statute- barred issue and any further work on the file in a telephone conversation following receipt of a memorandum from the Respondent on [date] July 2009. (d) the failure to follow up with t...

9. LCRO 10/2016 CT v WN (31 October 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...Downs Syndrome. For a number of years until 1990, he suffered sexual abuse perpetrated by a family member. As a result of this he suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and requires specialist treatment and constant supervision. ACC accepted a claim in 1993 for compensation as a result of his post-traumatic stress disorder but repeatedly refused to approve and pay for more than 13 hours of attendant care. Mrs CT had undertaken the attendant care of RT without compensation....

10. TX v UQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 355 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 163 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 355 APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT UQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TX claims that, on 28 September 2023, his car was damaged by a runaway trolley when his wife was about to leave the car park of the [supermarket]. He seeks $711.25, comprising repair costs and his $45.00 filing fee, from the owner of the super...