Sharma v CAC 20004 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 93 [pdf, 28 KB]
...property in the way that she had expected. [4] However the only issue before the Tribunal today is the question of whether or not Mr Sharma has complied with Rule 9.5. Dr Nixon says that she did not receive any market appraisals from Mr Sharma. She claims that she did not receive the 2 July letter advising her of any assessment of the likely market value of the property or any price suggestion in writing other than the verbal comments from Mr Sharma. Dr Nixon says she was never pro...