12996 items matching your search terms
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 208 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons Did S Ltd Limited mislead BW about the services it would provide? 1. BW contacted S Ltd by email on 12 April 2022 regarding services the company might provide. She had discovered a small amount of black mou...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 3 APPLICANT HW RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: BU Ltd must pay HW $420.00 by 4pm on 8 February 2023. Reasons: 1. On 11 November 2022 the applicant was charged $420.00 after his car was towed from a carparking building. The applicant had purchased a monthly subscription to park in any unreserved bay the carparkin...
...FIRST RESPONDENT TT SECOND RESPONDENT C Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT'S INSURER M Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. TT is to pay B Ltd $30,000.00 by 14 August 2024. 2. The claim against C Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In January 2021, Mr XT’s vehicle was damaged by paint overspray while at the C Ltd’s premises. 2. B Ltd initially brought a claim against Mr TT, who was carrying out spray-painting work at th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2014] NZDT 1346 APPLICANT (and Counterclaim Respondent) PG Limited RESPONDENT (and Counterclaim Applicant) KH Limited SECOND RESPONDENT JC Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. The claim against KH Limited is dismissed. 2. JC Limited is to pay PG Limited the sum of $8,336.11 on or before 14 November 201...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 27 APPLICANT QS RESPONDENT DD Limited The Tribunal orders: Ownership of the 2005 [vehicle] revested in DD Ltd as of 9 November 2021; and DD Ltd is to pay $3869.75 to QS on or before 20 May 2022, plus, in the same timeframe, is to pay whatever weekly payments of $58.64 (to the finance company) and $13.79 (for breakd...
...NZEmpC 153 EMPC 377/2015 EMPC 277/2016 EMPC 215/2017 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of interlocutory applications BETWEEN PETER D'ARCY LORIGAN Plaintiff AND INFINITY AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27 October 2017, and on documents filed on 2, 8, 10, 13, 20, 23 24 November, and 4, 5 December 2017 (...
...reporting to client. - hearing time * $48 per half hour For: • attending Interlocutory Hearing(s) • any agent fees. GRANTING NOTES – SCHEDULE A, B & C Legend * Repeatables - this is a repeatable activity and can be claimed per occurrence of this activity. This includes for all hearings/appearances that are stood down or adjourned, or which need to be rescheduled because the client fails to appear. The fee that can be claimed relates to the hearing ti...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 14 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT WN Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LB The Tribunal orders: LB is to pay directly to BT the sum of $47.72 on or before 27 July 2022. This order determines both the claim and counterclaim. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 330 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT X Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In April 2012, X Limited manufactured a set of double-glazed cedar french doors for DT. The doors were installed in her house to replace some existing doors. In May 2023, moisture appeared in the double-glazed pa...
...settlement date was 28 January 2022, which was bought forward to 27 January 2022 by agreement. 2. On 15 December 2021 the property was flooded, and an insurance claim was made to cover damage to the gib and other repairs. 3. On 21 December 2021 TT requested for the contract to be cancelled and offered for HN and SN keep the deposit. HN and SN did not agree that TT could cancel and reaffirmed that the insurer was arranging for the repairs to be carried out urgently and that it woul...