Search Results

1. SC & TO Partnership v QS & TS & JT Ltd [2022] NZDT 84 (24 May 2022) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT TS RESPONDENT QT & JT Ltd The Tribunal orders: QS, TS and QT and JT Ltd are to pay to SC and TO the sum of $600.00 on or before 14 June 2022. Reasons: 1. In October 2021, SC and TO (“the applicants”) entered into an agreement for sale and purchase of a property with QS, TS and QT and JT Ltd (“the respondents”). The property was situated at [street], [town]. 2. Various chattels were included in the agreement for sale and...

2. Nisha v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 23 (7 July 2011) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...a breach of the Code of Conduct, the Code having been developed pursuant to section 37 of the Act (published www.iaa.govt.nz). [3] Clause 1 of the Code requires a licensed immigration to, with due care, diligence, respect and professionalism, perform his or her services, act on proper instructions, and pursue their client’s interests. That clause also requires personal documents to be secured and returned to a client. Factual Issues [4] The Tribunal undertook a review of the whole o...

3. DE v NF [2023] NZDT 163 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 84 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 163 APPLICANT DE RESPONDENT NF The Tribunal orders: NF is to pay $2,156.25 to DE’s [bank] account [redacted] by the 2nd June 2023. Reasons 1. In the absence of NF and on the evidence before me I find NF caused damage to DE’s garage roller door through reckless use of a firearm. NF has admitted causing the dama...

4. II v XQ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1610 (6 July 2021) [pdf, 178 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1610 APPLICANT II RESPONDENT XQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: II’s claim for a declaration of non-liability to pay XQ Ltd $65.00 is dismissed; and XQ Ltd is not liable to refund to II the sum of $5.00; II must pay XQ Ltd $60.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] II seeks a declaration from the Disputes Tribunal that he is no...

5. AS Ltd v ZH Ltd [2014] NZDT 659 (26 September 2014) [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...has written under the pricing details “fix price for 12 months”. AS Limited’s manager agrees that that was written on the document she signed. [3] On 30 April 2014, when AS Limited was moving premises, AA signed another service agreement form recording the new address. [4] AS Limited contends that they only ever intended to enter into a month by month agreement and that their manager, AA, was misled into signing the agreement and that the document itself is misleading. AS Li...

6. P Ltd v W Ltd [2024] NZDT 16 (17 January 2024) [pdf, 254 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 16 APPLICANT P Ltd RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. P Ltd’s application is dismissed. Reasons 2. P Ltd is the owner of a [car] used by a senior employee, NL. On 4 December 2021, NL parked the car at the car park at [a beach], in order to meet with a friend. While attending the meeting NL saw an employee of W Ltd cl...

7. MI v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 102 (10 March 2023) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...was delivered on 23 December 2022 MI immediately determined that the machine protruded far beyond the space, and, in fact, measured closer to 720mm in depth than the described 650mm. 3. MI sought to return the machine to T Ltd who declined his request, treating it as a ‘change of mind’. The claim is therefore for the purchase price of the machine of $1394.35 plus $270.00 consequential losses of storage and/or laundromat time and expenses. 4. T Ltd did not provide a representativ...

8. KU v KG Ltd [2023] NZDT 18 (27 January 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 18 APPLICANT KU RESPONDENT KG Ltd The Tribunal orders: KG Ltd is to pay $2,500.00 to KU on or before Monday 13 February 2023. Reasons: 1. KU was gifted a voucher for a 10 hour, private big game charter in the Bay of Islands for up to four guests as a birthday present. The voucher expired on 17 September 2022, howe...

9. D Ltd v BQ & GN [2023] NZDT 27 (7 June 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 27 APPLICANT D Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT BQ SECOND RESPONDENT GN The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. BQ did not appear, the applicant’s representative and GN did. [2] The applicant claims payment for tiling work carried out...

10. B Ltd v KS [2022] NZDT 256 (21 December 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

    ...having only the first truckload of waste taken away, given that was the amount the price he had been given was based on, he would have done that because it was uneconomic for the truck to come back for only a half-load of waste. B Ltd says they were requested to empty the septic tank and that is what they did. 5. B Ltd’s position would be reasonable contractually if the price had increased only in proportion to the amount of waste taken away. However, because returning to remove onl...