13147 items matching your search terms
...WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20120007946 UNDER Sections 37, 239 and 338 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tunapahore 6 BETWEEN KATARINA POWELL Applicant Hearing: 128 Waiariki MB 206-211, 6 October 2015 (Heard at Ōpōtiki) Appearances: K Powell in person Judgment: 29 October 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JU...
...AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 75 [16 June 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 75 EMPC 141/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN MOBEEN BHIKOO Plaintiff AND STEPHEN MARR HAIR DESIGN NEWMARKET LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 3 and 30 May 2016 Appearances: P Pa'u and J Lewis...
...“Papa”. They regard the appellant as their grandfather. While XXXX was in hospital they all visited her every night or every second night. The appellant was named as XXXX [23] The appellant said that contact person on hospital admission forms. XXXX and her family continued to pay the rates on the property at XXXX Road while he was living there. XXXX said that she and Mr XXXX [24] currently share payment of the rates. XXXX [25] children regard the appellant as their s...
...January 2016 DATE OF THIS FURTHER RULING 11 February 2016 COUNSEL The appellant on his own behalf Mr M J Hodge, for the Authority Mr J Katz QC, for the licensee RULING ON ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE FROM THE LATE MS J. D. ALEXANDER The Application [1] Over 26 and 27 January 2016 many admissibility issues were raised by counsel and most have been resolved after discussion. Further, Mr Eichelbaum, as appellant, applies to adduce certain evidence given by the late Ms Julie...
...their substantive grievances. The plaintiffs have not sought this information from the defendant as they might have, using the document disclosure rules in the Employment Court Regulations 2000. [3] The plaintiffs purport to make this urgent application for disclosure under s 69 of the Evidence Act 2006. That is, however, inappropriate for a number of reasons. First, the Evidence Act does not govern proceedings in the Employment Court. The Employment Court is not one of the cou...
...Adviser: In person Date Issued: 18 October 2012 2 DECISION Introduction [1] This complaint was upheld in a decision issued on 31 July 2012. [2] It concerned a complaint that Ms Nassiep failed to lodge visa applications for Mr Cavanagh competently. The first was late, and relied on the grounds that were bound to fail. [3] When Ms Nassiep became licensed, she did not go through the process for establishing a professional relationship, which inclu...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 100 READT 031/14 UNDER Sections 92 and 115 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20005) Prosecutor/Applicant AND ALAN MORTON-JONES Defendant/Respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member HEARD ON THE PAPERS DATE OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO INTERIM-SUSPEND LICENCE – 24 Sept...
1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 August 2017 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 August 2017, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori...
...PHP401,000 (approximately $11,797 New Zealand dollars (NZD)) for Ms Navarette-Scholes’ services. [3.2] On 3 September 2012, Ms Navarette-Scholes wrote to the complainant asking her to sign a written agreement for her services in relation to a work visa application. Ms Navarette-Scholes arranged employment for the complainant in New Zealand and submitted a work visa to Immigration New Zealand. Immigration New Zealand granted the application on 14 September 2012. [3.3] In November 2012...
...“agreement”). The clauses relate to penal payments for employees who work weekend and night work and penal payments for employees who work on public holidays (referred to in the agreement as special holidays). [2] The clauses overlap in their application and effect. The interpretation is sought as to whether the employer is bound to pay an accumulation of the penal rates, in total amounting to triple time, when a public holiday also falls to be observed on a Satu...