Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 025 Greater Wellington Regional Council v Adams [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI-A-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA IN THE J\.!IATIER BETWEEN AND AND AND AND AND AND Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 25 of an application for enforcement orders under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 GREATER WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2021-WLG-000019) Applicant STUART LEE ADAMS First Respondent QUALITY NZ HOMES LIMITED Second Respondent HENRY ADAMS LIMITED Third Respondent LIORAH CELESTE ATKINSO...

2. Thomas v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 45 [pdf, 110 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2011-100-000043 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 45 BETWEEN BARRY FREDRICK THOMAS AND PAULINE JOAN THOMAS Claimant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND TERRY BROWN Second Respondent AND ROHINEET SHARMA Third Respondent AND THUSHANI SURANGI SHARMA Fourth Respondent Hearing: 24 and 26 April 2012 Appearances: D Barr and K Tidbury for the claimants and first respondent D Carden and L Sabo for the third and fourth

3. Lethbridge v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Fenton, Fenton v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Lethbridge [2018] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 506 KB]

   ...made and accepted”. 3.2 The Committee determined that no further action should be taken in respect of the other parts of the complaint. In particular, the Committee found that: (a) There was insufficient evidence to support Mr Fenton’s claims that he lacked capacity when he entered into the Agreement. Nor was there any evidence that Ms Lethbridge knew about the medication Mr Fenton was taking or that he was suffering any side effects. (b) A CMA had been signed by Ms Lethb...

4. Orsborn v CAC 20006 & Collier & JVL Prestige Realty Ltd[2013] NZREADT 69 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...At the time of listing the property, the vendors also advised the licensee that there was to be a “boundary adjustment” to include the front paddock of the property in the land belonging to 147 Kawakawa Road, which the vendors also owned. The application to the local Council for this boundary adjustment was made on 26 May 2011, but not approved until 16 June 2011. [9] The appellants accept that, at all relevant times prior to their purchasing the property, they knew that a boundary...

5. 2011 to 2014 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...crime and victimisation. We provide advice on developing and reforming legislation to ensure laws and sanctions deter potential offenders and hold offenders to account. We support the Crown and iwi in settling historical Treaty of Waitangi claims. We provide claims management, research, report writing and inquiry support to the Waitangi Tribunal. We oversee implementation of settlements and preserve the value of properties in the Crown ‘landbank’, until they are required i...

6. [2007] NZEmpC CC 24A/07 Service and Food Workers Union v Alsco NZ [pdf, 69 KB]

   SERVICE & FOOD WORKERS UNION INC V ALSCO NZ CHCH CC 24A/07 21 November 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH CC 24A/07 CRC 45/07 IN THE MATTER OF an application for an interim injunction to restrain lockouts BETWEEN SERVICE AND FOOD WORKERS UNION NGA RINGA TOTA INC Plaintiff AND ALSCO NZ Defendant Hearing: 21 November 2007 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: Peter Cranney and Camilla Belich, Counsel for Plaintiff SL Hornsby-Geluk and CN Devlin,...

7. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 DM expert Robert Greenway [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...interpretation. A short marine education walk would support local tourism activity and ease waiting times for ferry users. Enclosure, reclamation/decking and additional traffic would seriously limit this option over the long-term, and degrade a form of recreation which currently remains a stark contrast to that available at the Auckland ferry terminal, from which Matiatia Bay must differentiate itself. CODE OF CONDUCT 14. I am familiar with the Environment Court’s Code...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 103 Muldoon v Nelson Marlborough DHB [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...Mr Muldoon‟s grievance. He has elected to challenge that determination by hearing de novo. [2] The relevant facts are largely uncontroversial. Although both parties tendered extensive evidence about related events (such as Mr Muldoon‟s applications for permanent positions with the Board and the reasons for his non- appointment), they are not material to the Court‟s determination of the essential 1 [2011] NZERA Christchurch 16...

9. [2021] NZACC 126 - Botha v ACC (4 August 2021) [pdf, 534 KB]

   ...diagnosed moderate hearing loss, feeding difficulties and failing to grow. Kevin has required ongoing additional assistance and therapy ever since. Much of this has been carried out by his parents. [7] Dr Katie Tuck completed a treatment injury claim for Kevin on 5 July 2016. She described the treatment injury as management of the birth process. That Kevin suffered an injury at birth suggesting a significant hypoxic event during labour was not detected by attending staff. ACC�...

10. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Terra Nova Planning Limited v Auckland Council (Topic-056-057) [pdf, 742 KB]

    ...outcomes. Relief Sought TNP submits that the provision of a hamlet subdivision and development rules of the kind currently in the ADP: Rodney Section to apply to the same or equivalent rural zones; provided that such rules should be generically applicable to qualifying sites and not dependant on prior identification by the council. Subdivision in the Future Urban Zone The Future Urban Zone provisions of the PAUP will essentially ‘lock‘ landowners into a zone with Rural P...