Search Results

1. [2008] Waikato DHB & ors v New Zealand PSA Inc AC 6/08 [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...of the PSA and the Midlands DHBs in February, March and April 2006. What occurred at these meetings is the subject of dispute yet to be resolved but following them the advocate for the Midlands DHBs provided the PSA with a draft meca in the form that was subsequently signed by all parties and dated 21 April 2006. The Employment Relations Authority’s determination [10] Although these include matters of disputed fact to be determined by the trial Judge, the following are neverthe...

2. Barfoot & Thompson v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...phoned Mrs Smith directly, identifying himself as a Barfoot & Thompson agent and mentioned that he may have an offer. Mrs Smith proceeded to tell Mr Littler how many offers had been made and approximately how much they were for. Mrs Smith also informed Mr Littler that their tenants had given notice and the vendors (Mr and Mrs Smith) wanted to sell the property before they needed to re-tenant it. Mr Littler then informed Mrs Smith that he and his wife were the prospective purchasers...

3. 2021-03-01 ORC - MOC - PC7 - mining permits - annexure E [pdf, 452 KB]

   ...Page 5 of 9 S8 Main Tail-Race Licence – Every current mining privilege that is a main tail race licence shall during its currency entitle the holder of the privilege to cut, construct, and maintain a race in order to carry off from such claims or tail races as are specified in the licence any water, tailings, sludge, and other refuse or waste from mining operations within the meaning of the Mining Act 1971: provided that where any such licence was granted before 10 Septem...

4. 2021-05-12 Carrick Irrigation Exhibit Consent 2002.448-002.pdf [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...WSCA and 1969). S8 Main Tail-Race Licence – Every current mining privilege that is a main tail race licence shall during its currency entitle the holder of the privilege to cut, construct, and maintain a race in order to carry off from such claims or tail races as are specified in the licence any water, tailings, sludge, and other refuse or waste from mining operations within the meaning of the Mining Act 1971: provided that where any such licence was granted before 10 Septe...

5. [2020] NZIACDT 45 - TTD v Zheng (14 October 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...agency assisted them to obtain visitor visas. [7] Mr Zheng continued to advise the complainant on the visitor visas and their proposed student visas. She and her husband signed a client agreement with Mr Zheng on 30 September 2018 concerning applications for student visas for them both. [8] The complainant resigned from her position at the employer as from 2 November 2018. 1 TTD v Zheng [2020] NZIACDT 37. 3 [9] Immigration New...

6. Legal Complaints Review Officer v Hong [2015] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 48 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 37 LCDT 025/12 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER Applicant AND BOON GUNN HONG Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms S Fitzgerald Mr K Raureti Ms C Rowe Mr I Williams HEARING 14 October 2015 HELD AT Auckland District Court DATE OF DECISION 12 November 2015...

7. 2021-03-01 ORC - MOC - PC7 - mining permits - annexure D [pdf, 23 MB]

   ...by WSCA and 1969). S8 Main Tail−Race Licence — Every current mining privilege that is a main tail race licence shall during its currency entitle the holder o f the privilege to cut, construct, and maintain a race in order to carry of f from such claims or tail races as are specified in the licence any water, tailings, sludge, and other refuse or waste from mining operations within the meaning o f the Mining Act 1971: provided that where any such licence was granted before 10 September 196...

8. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2024] NZACC 116 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Impairment Assessment – clauses 58-61, Schedule 1, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 19 August 2022. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decision dated 9 May 2022 advising the appellant that he was not eligible for a further lump sum payment. 2 Background [2] The appellant has cover for concussion and a traumatic amputa...

9. BORA Income Tax Bill [pdf, 399 KB]

   ...of the Bill excludes a person on an income-tested benefit from receiving a family assistance credit. Families receiving an income-tested benefit are treated differently from those receiving family assistance credits in that they receive a different form of government assistance. Nevertheless, in most cases, the level of assistance received by families on an income-tested benefit is greater than the amount they would receive through a family assistance credit. For this reason, it can be arg...

10. Matchitt v Butler - Matangareka 3B (2018) 189 Waiariki MB 74 (189 WAR 74) [pdf, 673 KB]

    189 Waiariki MB 74 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20160006430 UNDER Sections 19 and 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Matangareka 3B BETWEEN EDWARD MATCHITT APPLICANT AND RICHARD JOHN BUTLER, THOMAS HENRY BUTLER, STEWART JAMES BUTLER, TUIHANA POOK, MAURA HIONA ROBSON AND MOANA PAREHUIA WAITITI AS TRUSTEES OF MATANGAREKA 3B TRUST Respondents Hearing: 18 November 2017, 153 Wai...