Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 177 Rimene v P J Doherty & Natusch Group Ltd [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...any party to a matter before the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) who is dissatisfied with the determination of the Authority or any part of such determination may elect to have the matter heard by the Court by filing a statement of claim in the prescribed manner within 28 days after the date of the determination in question. [2] In a minute dated 24 May 2012, Chief Judge Colgan confirmed that Mr Rimene had filed an application seeking an extension of time in which to...

2. MT v EB [2023] NZDT 508 (1 November 2023) [pdf, 239 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 508 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT EB The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MT purchased a saddle after seeing it advertised on EB’s [online] account. After her successful bid, she contacted EB on 6 February and asked her to “look at postage to [City] plea...

3. EX v TY [2022] NZDT 273 (16 December 2022) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...of probabilities that TY has not breached the guarantees under the CGA, and EX is not entitled to claim a refund of $3,925.10. Accordingly, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Fuli Date: 16 December 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. Redruth v Dereham LCRO 154 / 2010 (10 November 2010) [pdf, 132 KB]

   LCRO 154/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 3 BETWEEN MR REDRUTH on behalf of ETL Applicant AND MR DEREHAM Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] The New Zealand Law Society received a complaint from Mr Redruth (the Applicant)...

5. EI & MQ v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 485 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 485 APPLICANT EI APPLICANT MQ RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. M Ltd is to pay EI and MQ $6,000.00 on or before 19 July 2024. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. EI and MQ purchased a [Queen mattress], split queen base, a mattress protector, [brand] silk pillow including delivery and installat

6. What happens next

   Acknowledgement of your claim Once we receive your notice of claim, we’ll send you an acknowledgement and a receipt for your application fee. Phone conference & directions hearing The Authority may hold a phone conference before the hearing to make sure everyone has the information they need. It may also arrange a directions hearing to ensure progress is being made on the claim. The hearing Time & place At least 10 days before your case is due to be heard, we’ll tell you the day and...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Taxation and Charities Review Authority >
   3. Tax Disputes

7. Coleman v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 41 [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Trading Act 1986. DOES THE COUNCIL HAVE AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENCE TO THE CLAIM FOR UNIT 112B? [4] On 25 August 2008, Benjamin Coleman, the representative of Unit 112D, applied for an assessor’s report. Unit 112B was not included in this application however Ms Bamford subsequently authorised Mr Coleman to bring the claim for her unit. The relevant chronology is set out below: Date Action 10 December 1998 Final inspection of 112B by the Council. 22 December...

8. T Ltd v WE [2024] NZDT 705 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 705 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT WE The Tribunal orders: The claim and counter-claim are both dismissed. Reasons 1. Mr L of T Ltd paid $10,000.00 to WE on 10 May 2023 as part of a ‘handshake’ agreement to purchase his cleaning business which had one client at that time, a childcare centre. 2. T Ltd started cleaning at the...

9. [2007] NZEmpC WC 33/07 Balfour v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 42 KB]

   BALFOUR V CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WN WC 33/07 14 December 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 33/07 WRC 22/07 IN THE MATTER OF an application for compliance order and compensation AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the defendant to strike out proceedings BETWEEN DAVID NEIL BALFOUR Plaintiff AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Defendant Hearing: 23 October 2007 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: D N B...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 94 Independent Prosperity Ltd v Huang [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 94 EMPC 267/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN INDEPENDENT PROSPERITY LIMITED Plaintiff AND QISHAN HUANG Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: J Nguy and H Huang, counsel for plaintiff B Hinchcliff, counsel...