Search Results

1. Kruger v Nikora - Tuhoe -Te Uru Taumatua [2021] Māori Appellate Court MB 444 (2021 APPEAL 444) [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...(2020 APPEAL 248). He mahi whakawā ma te Kooti Whenua Māori ki te TUT? Does the Māori Land Court have jurisdiction over TUT? [10] This appeal concerns s 236(1) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”). It provides: 236 Application of sections 237 to 245 (1) Subject to subsection (2), sections 237 to 245 shall apply to the following trusts: (a) every trust constituted under this Part: (b) every other trust constituted in respect of any Maori land: (c...

2. Volume-II-Supporting-Information-and-AEE_1-November-22.pdf [pdf, 12 MB]

   ŌTAKI TO NORTH OF LEVIN HIGHWAY PROJECT Volume II - Notices of Requirement for a Designation and Application for Resource Consents: Supporting Information and Assessment of Effects on the Environment 1 NOVEMBER 2022 Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project VOLUME II - SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT i DISCLAIMER This Report has been prepared for the benefit of the New Zealand Transport Agency (trading as Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency)....

3. [2008] Waikato DHB & ors v New Zealand PSA Inc AC 6/08 [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...of the PSA and the Midlands DHBs in February, March and April 2006. What occurred at these meetings is the subject of dispute yet to be resolved but following them the advocate for the Midlands DHBs provided the PSA with a draft meca in the form that was subsequently signed by all parties and dated 21 April 2006. The Employment Relations Authority’s determination [10] Although these include matters of disputed fact to be determined by the trial Judge, the following are neverthe...

4. Barfoot & Thompson v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...phoned Mrs Smith directly, identifying himself as a Barfoot & Thompson agent and mentioned that he may have an offer. Mrs Smith proceeded to tell Mr Littler how many offers had been made and approximately how much they were for. Mrs Smith also informed Mr Littler that their tenants had given notice and the vendors (Mr and Mrs Smith) wanted to sell the property before they needed to re-tenant it. Mr Littler then informed Mrs Smith that he and his wife were the prospective purchasers...

5. Kaufusi v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 105 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...little doubt the purpose of section 51(1)(g) is the same in effect as that applying in the authorities discussed. [33] The complainant and the Registrar have elected not to apply for costs of investigation or representation. Given Ms Tangilanu’s claimed inability to meet any such order, the approach is not surprising. [34] Ms Tangilanu has generally resisted admitting responsibility for the complaints, and the Tribunal has incurred the cost of dealing with them. However, there would b...

6. ORC & Ngai Tahu Ki Murihiku - EIC - Dean Whaanga - 17 September 2021 [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...MATTER of the Omnibus Plan Change - Plan Change 8, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF DEAN WHAANGA ON BEHALF OF OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL AND NGĀI TAHU KI MURIHIKU 17 September 2021 Applicant'...

7. CAC 10017 v Sherburn [2013] NZREADT 105 [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...occupation free of rental. [12] However, prior to settlement, issues arose between the parties. The Harlows alleged misrepresentation and the imposition of restrictive covenants without their consent. Rather than settle the purchase of the land and claim damages (if available), they sought to renegotiate the purchase price. The vendor (Sherman Ltd) declined such overtures, issued a settlement notice and, ultimately, cancelled the agreement and issued proceedings in the High Court at...

8. Matchitt v Butler - Matangareka 3B (2018) 189 Waiariki MB 74 (189 WAR 74) [pdf, 673 KB]

   189 Waiariki MB 74 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20160006430 UNDER Sections 19 and 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Matangareka 3B BETWEEN EDWARD MATCHITT APPLICANT AND RICHARD JOHN BUTLER, THOMAS HENRY BUTLER, STEWART JAMES BUTLER, TUIHANA POOK, MAURA HIONA ROBSON AND MOANA PAREHUIA WAITITI AS TRUSTEES OF MATANGAREKA 3B TRUST Respondents Hearing: 18 November 2017, 153 Wai...

9. Director of Proceedings v Te Whatu Ora [2023] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 461 KB]

   ...Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 9 November 2022. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make orders by consent. The parties have filed: [2.1] A statement of claim dated 9 November 2022 [2.2] A consent memorandum dated 9 November 2022. [2.3] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [3] In the consent memorandum dated 9 November 2022 the parties request that the...

10. Māori Land Court - Rule 5.11 Schedule - August 2018 [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 August 2018 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 August 2018, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori