Search Results

1. Bahramitash v CAC 402 & Ritesh [2016] NZREADT 40 [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Estate Agents Authority) regarding a telephone call made by her; and (b) A copy of an earlier decision of the Committee dated 10 September 2015, in which it found that the appellant had engaged in unsatisfactory conduct. [9] The appellant’s application is opposed by the Authority. Submissions have been filed on behalf of both the appellant and the Authority. 4 Relevant principles as to the admission of evidence by the Tribunal [10] Section 109(1) of the Real Estate...

2. PQ v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 59 (17 September 2013) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...be obliged to have regard to the fact this complaint was upheld. These would be matters for the Registrar to consider at that time. This Tribunal cannot direct the Registrar; it is his decision to be made on the facts then existing, should such an application be made. [12] I am satisfied the statutory scheme is that this Tribunal mandates a maximum of two years prohibition on applying for a licence, and then the issue lies with the Registrar. I do not consider that it is necessary or app...

3. Horticulture New Zealand.pdf [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...demonstrates N loss maintenance or reduction as required by Policy 2; and the stock exclusion standards set out in Schedule C must be complied with. Amend condition 3 of Rule 3.11.4.4 so that a Nitrogen Leaching Loss Rate is only required where the applicant elects to qualify for the rule through claiming a Moderate Nitrogen Leaching Loss Oppose in part It is appropriate to allow preparation of farm environment plans (FEPs) for consented activities where these are then certified...

4. A & T Kaufusi v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 98 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...Accordingly, I will consider the situation from a “worst case” perspective in order to determine 1 R v Williams [1988] 1 NZLR 748 (CA); while this case deals with criminal sentencing, its principles are applicable as a guide in the context of professional disciplinary sanctions as, although punishment is not their purpose, penalties necessarily carry a punitive element in their effect. 4 whether any reductions can or s...

5. [2022] NZACC 111 – Parkinson v ACC (9 June 2022) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...Respondent Hearing: 3 June 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau BY AVL Appearances: J Miller for the appellant C Hlavac for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment: 9 June 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim by Corporation for payment of levies by self-employed person - s 14, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 19 April 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an applicati...

6. Horticulture New Zealand.pdf [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...demonstrates N loss maintenance or reduction as required by Policy 2; and the stock exclusion standards set out in Schedule C must be complied with. Amend condition 3 of Rule 3.11.4.4 so that a Nitrogen Leaching Loss Rate is only required where the applicant elects to qualify for the rule through claiming a Moderate Nitrogen Leaching Loss Oppose in part It is appropriate to allow preparation of farm environment plans (FEPs) for consented activities where these are then certified...

7. National Standards Committee v Jefferies [2016] NZLCDT 29 [pdf, 40 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 29 LCDT 018/16 UNDER the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND KEITH IAN JEFFERIES Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr J Bishop Mr W Chapman Ms M Scholtens QC Ms P Walker HEARING at Wellington Tribunals Centre DATE OF HEARING 22 September 2016 DATE OF DECISION 3...

8. JM v AHX [2011] NZIACDT 10 (29 March 2011) [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...The conduct was aggravated by attempting to have a complaint withdrawn by a payment of money in one instance. [10] The decision also dealt with him having stolen from his employers, and having been convicted of a criminal offence as a result. SN claimed before that Tribunal he was otherwise of good character, which resulted in a disputed fact hearing. That hearing established he had earlier been dismissed from employment in a legal firm that acted as an immigration consultancy, after...

9. FERGUSON Suzanne Claudia (CSU 2010 WHG 000160) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...a protective helmet at the time or any other personal protective equipment. [33] A reconstruction of what happened based on the available evidence suggests Ms Ferguson has travelled approximately 400 metres west of her house by means of the formed and established farm tracks. It appears she may have driven off one of the usual tracks at one stage and travelled parallel to the wire electric fence heading up the slope. The skids towards the top of the hill suggest that she has l...

10. MENDOZA Carlos Frederick (CSU 2010 WHG 000185) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...report confirmed there were no witnesses to this crash. [30] The issue of quad bike maintenance was considered and the bike was independently examined by Rendell’s-Suzuki in Dargaville3. They submitted a report dated 28 September 2010 which forms part of the Department of Labour’s file. They found the condition of the wheel bearings and ball joints were in good working order. Whilst there was some small movement in the outer tie rod ends,