12996 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 453 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT TM APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 15 February 2022, there was a collision between ET’s [car 1] and TM’s [car 2] on the [Street 1] roundabout. ET claims that she entered the roundabout from [Street 1] and was in...
If you want to appeal to the Social Security Appeal Authority, you must do so within 60 working days of the Benefits Review Committee’s decision. If you make an appeal after the 60 working days has passed, you must state in a letter with your application why your appeal is late and why you think it should be accepted. How much does it cost to appeal? There’s no fee to make an appeal to the Authority. Present your case You can present your own case or have a lawyer, or advocate, present...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 61 APPLICANT BL & TL RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: N Ltd is to pay $4999.00 to BL & TL on or before 4 March 2024. Reasons 1. In late 2021, BL & TL engaged N Ltd to carry out a pre-purchase inspection for a property they subsequently purchased. The inspection identified some water damage in the kitch
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1361 APPLICANT KD FIRST RESPONDENT NI Limited SECOND RESPONDENT B Council The Tribunal hereby orders: NI Ltd is to pay $4999.00 to Mrs D on or before 20 December; and The claim against B Council is struck out for lack of jurisdiction. Reasons 1. Mrs D purchased a house from NI Ltd in August 201...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 1 APPLICANT DT APPLICANT KT APPLICANT UT RESPONDENT MU The Tribunal orders: MU is to pay DT, KT and UT $27,390.00 on or before 7 February 2025. Reasons 1. On 25 February 2024, DT, KT and UT purchased [Racehorse], an 8-year-old thoroughbred and ex-racehorse from MU for $22,500.00, for equestrian eventing. On 2 March 2024, on t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1684 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT KO The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. DD is to remain in the possession of KO. Reasons: 1. TD claims her former neighbour, KO, gifted her a young cat named D on 8/6/2021 in the course of a telephone conversation. Following the conversation, TD took the cat to the vet, had...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 38 APPLICANT WD RESPONDENT NU SECOND RESPONDENT OT The Tribunal orders: NU and OT are jointly and severally liable to pay WD the sum of $1040.00 by no later than 23 February 2024. Reasons: 1. WD was a flatmate in a house rented by NU and OT. When entering the flat in November 2020, WD paid a bond of $800....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1660 APPLICANTS HI and UI c/ the Trust AND APPLICANT LN c/ the Trust APPLICANT BJ Limited RESPONDENT QD Limited SECOND RESPONDENT DU THIRD RESPONDENT HS Limited The Tribunal orders: BJ Limited is joined as an applicant to the claim. The claims are dismissed. Reaso...
...were required to comply with the IPPs prescribed in the PA and to apply the relevant provisions the PA. Accordingly, references in this decision are to the relevant sections of the 1993 Act, unless otherwise specified. 3 Mr Cheng’s statement of claim dated 25 March 2021 at paragraphs 2 to 4. 4 Due to the imprecise nature of the pleadings, by memorandum dated 2 August 2024 these issues were proposed by Corrections, not objected to by Mr Cheng and are adopted by the Tribunal. 3 [5....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 749 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This is a claim for the sum of $3,299.01 for a refund of a N Ltd stainless steel [gas cooktop]. 2. I note that a hearing took place on 7 August 2024 and was adjourned to allow for a N Ltd technician to visit the applicant’s premises t...