Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12987 items matching your search terms

  1. TX v CD [2024] NZDT 375 (5 June 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 375 APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT CD APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: CD is to pay J Ltd the sum of $5,143.95 within 21 days. Reasons 1. On 21 August 2023 at about 8am (being a very busy time), the applicant was driving his motor vehicle along the T2 lane of [road 1]. 2. At that time, the respondent was in her motor...

  2. T Ltd v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 672 (15 November 2023) [pdf, 105 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 672 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: C Ltd must pay T Ltd $5,852.55 by 4pm on 13 December 2023. Reasons: 1. The applicant leased a commercial unit to the respondent from 2017. The rent was reviewed in 2019 and 2021. After a rent review in May 2023, the lease was terminated in September 2023. The applica...

  3. BE v MG [2023] NZDT 262 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 262 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT MG The Tribunal orders: 1. MG is to pay BE $19,000.00 on or before 11 July 2023. 2. The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In April 2022, BE and MG entered into a loan agreement where MG borrowed $29,000 from BE to purchase a [car] registration [number...

  4. FB v TT Ltd [2022] NZDT 201 (17 July 2022) [pdf, 156 KB]

    Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 201 APPLICANT FB RESPONDENT TT Ltd The Tribunal orders: TT Ltd is to pay $5,520.00 to FB by 10 August 2022. Reasons: 1. This order should be read with that dated 24/2/22. What were the relevant terms of the contract the parties entered into: both the written terms and the implied terms? Was the quote to be valid indefinitely...

  5. Statement of Defence and Counterclaim [docx, 55 KB]

    [bookmark: _GoBack]Guidance on Using the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim Template About the statement of defence and counterclaim [bookmark: Purpose]Use this form if you have been served with a claim in the District Court, and you wish to both defend the claim AND counterclaim against the plaintiff. You must file in the court and serve on the plaintiff a Statement of Defence and Counterclaim within the timeframe specified on the notice of proceedings. This is usually within 25 working day...

  6. BC v BQ [2024] NZDT 390 (5 June 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

    ...leased to BC for her daughter to ride at a 3 day horse camp from 19-21 April. Over this period BC had the horse insured. On 23 April BQ retrieved [the horse] and claimed that she was lame. On 28 April BC decided not to proceed with the purchase and requested a refund. 2. BC claims $12,250.00 for the purchase price and the Disputes Tribunal fee. 3. BQ counter claims $8,000.00 for the reduced value of [the horse]. 4. The issues to be determined are: a. What were the terms...

  7. BE v TD Ltd [2023] NZDT 317 (25 July 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 317 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT TD Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] BE bought a [car] from TD Ltd, represented by Ms C. BE considers that it is defective, and claims a refund and/or compensation from TD Ltd. [2] Both parties provided written submissions, in which they set out their respective...

  8. T Ltd v MC [2023] NZDT 614 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...accommodation arrangement is or is not a residential tenancy or boarding house arrangement. T Ltd was given until 24 July 2023 to provide confirmation from the Tenancy Tribunal as to the nature of the arrangement. 4. T Ltd did not provide any information in the Disputes Tribunal before 24 July and the matter was set down for further hearing in front of me.1 DI advised at the second hearing that he had contacted Tenancy Services after the previous hearing and was told this was not a mat...

  9. [2011] NZEmpC 115 Muldoon v Nelson Marlborough DHB supplementary [pdf, 68 KB]

    ...live applications before the Court, it, as in the case of other courts, is empowered to recall its judgments to correct slips or omissions. Failure to deal with an issue raised in the proceeding or, more particularly as in this case, to grant a form of relief claimed, is a classic example of the appropriate exercise of such a power. If the Court has overlooked doing something it ought to have addressed, then it is only just that there should be a procedure to enable that to be consi...

  10. MD v D Ltd [2019] NZDT 1513 (12 August 2019) [pdf, 194 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1513 APPLICANT MD RESPONDENT EN SECOND RESPONDENT LK THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT D Limited THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT E Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: D Limited is to pay MD $5,615.75 on or before Monday 26 August 2019. Reasons: [1] MD purchased from D Limited (D...