12987 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 78 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT BE The Tribunal orders: T Ltd’s claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BE was previously a shareholder, director and also employed by T Ltd. Relations broke down between the parties in approximately 2014/2015, which resulted in litigation in both the High Court and in the employment arena. These matters ha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 179 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT X Inc The Tribunal orders: The claim by TD against X Inc is dismissed. Reasons 1. TD was a member of X Inc for a number of years. TD now brings a claim against X Inc for $4000.00. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Was there a contract between TD and X Inc? (b) If so, did X Inc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 391 APPLICANT DC APPLICANT IC RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. J Ltd is to remove the posts and corrugated iron fencing that were added to the original boundary fence at the front of the adjoining properties on or before 12 July 2024. 2. If the original boundary fence is damaged in the removal of the posts and corrug
...[2024] NZLCRO 090 Ref: LCRO 52/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AD Applicant AND OC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant, Mr AD, has applied for review of a decision of the [Area] Standar...
...and want to dispute the sale – you’ll need to go through the Disputes Tribunal. Disputes Tribunal If you’re making a claim against a registered trader or from a trader that meets the criteria for registration but isn’t, we can register your application when we receive it. Notifying the trader We send a copy of your claim and a notice to the trader that tells them to talk to you about the application within 14 days of receiving the notice (unless the adjudicator changes the date). The t...
Compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonmentCompensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment Process for determining eligibility and quantum of compensation Conviction set aside or quashed Applicant writes to Minister of Justice seeking compensation Minister seeks advice of Ministry of Justice Eligible for consideration under Cabinet guidelines Ministry advises Minister whether claim “merits further assessment” Advice is YES, Minister appoints QC to assess the cla...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 458 APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT OL The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks compensation following the purchase of a vehicle, a [vehicle] from the respondent in March 2024. The applica...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 431 APPLICANT EQ APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: EQ and KQ are ordered to pay D Ltd the sum of $221.38. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 14 June 2024. Reasons: 1) The applicants contacted the respondent to fix a leaking tap and a leak in a shower. They say they informed the res...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1471 APPLICANT HG RESPONDENT HN Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: HN Ltd is to pay HG the sum of $137.61 on or before 18 September 2019. Reasons: 1. HN Ltd is contracted by IO to provide services including lawnmowing and weed eating for a number of its properties. HG is a resident at one such property. HG brings a claim ag...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 722 APPLICANT GM RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. GM is not liable to Q Ltd for $320.00 claimed under Q Ltd’s [reference]. 2. The claim by Q Ltd against GM is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. On 11 March 2024, GM (‘GM’) parked in the car park of N Ltd. She was in the park for approximately seven minutes. In May 2024...