12982 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1685 APPLICANT DU RESPONDENT BL SECOND RESPONDENT KL The Tribunal orders: The claim by DU against BL and KL is dismissed. Reasons 1. On or about 12 February 2021 DU purchased a property at [address] (“the property”) from BL and KL. The purchase price included a dishwasher. DU claims that the dishwa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 207 APPLICANT DG RESPONDENT CM The Tribunal orders: CM is to pay DG $11,603.00 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. In April 2022 DG purchased a car from CM. DG claims that CM misled him in regard to the cause of noise in the car’s engine and claims the cost of repairs. 2. CM had the car looked at by...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1400 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT BH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BU bought a car from BH in a private sale on about 13 June 2020 after answering an internet advertisement placed by BH. The parties had a discussion about the car and BU decided to buy it. She paid for it and took it...
...DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 160 APPLICANT KI RESPONDENT NX SECOND RESPONDENT DX The Tribunal orders: DX is to pay KI the sum of $100.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. The claim against NX is dismissed. Reasons 1. KI was riding his bike on the [Street 1] cycleway approaching the [Street 2] intersection when DX’s bike hit KI’s bike damaging the front wheel of KI’s bike. DX had been riding his bike alon...
...The Tribunal orders: The claim by BN and HH against HT and BB is partially proved. HT and BB are jointly and severally liable and are to pay BN and HH a total of $500.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 14 September 2023. Reasons 1. The applicants BN and HH (the applicants) purchased a house from HT and BB (the respondents). The applicants now bring a claim against the respondents for $10,613.30. 2. The applicants claim that the Sale and Purchase Agreement (the agreement) did...
...dated 22 August and respond to your queries: Your letter of 27 July claimed that you were denied extra help, namely TAS, on 13 October 2009. You did not apply for TAS or provide information to enable a grant to be considered. Mr Rakiraki has since requested that you apply for this Temporary Additional Support. To date, no application has been received. [20] It is to be noted that Ms Dixon wrote to Mr Holmes within two working days of receipt, well inside the statutory time limit bu...
...as there is no evidence the failure was substantial in any way, I find the claim must be dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: K. Edwards Date: 28 April 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...
...Member Mr BK Neeson, Member Mr R Ludbrook for Plaintiff Ms M Coleman for Defendant Ms J Ryan for Director of Human Rights Proceedings DATE OF DECISION: 22 February 2013 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL GRANTING NON-PARTY ACCESS TO STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND STATEMENT OF REPLY Background [1] The statement of claim by Adoption Action Incorporated was received on 22 July 2011 and the Attorney-General filed a statement of reply dated 30 August 2011. [2] For reasons recorded in the Mi...
[2015] NZWHT AUCKLAND 1 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 7327: HGW Trustees Limited and Hilary Calvert as trustees of the Frongopoulos Trust – 8 Backshed Road, Queenstown ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Hilary Calvert and HGW Trustees Limited are the owners of a property at 8...
...eighth respondents have applied to the Tribunal to be removed from these proceedings in terms of s 112 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). [2] This Procedural Order will determine the fourth respondent’s removal application. The fourth respondent’s application for removal [3] On 16 July 2021, the first respondent, Queenstown Lakes District Council, made application to the Tribunal under s 111 of the Act to join to this claim, amongst other r...