12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 338 APPLICANT DK Ltd RESPONDENT UT C/- QU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) The sole director of the applicant company, DK Ltd is, according to the companies register, TN. [At the hearing, TN suggested others were also directors. That is not indicated by the companies register]. TN says that in 2018 his mo...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1363 APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT TU Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Ms T parked in a visitor’s parking space at a residential complex where she was looking after a friend’s child, in excess of the stated time limit of two hours. TU Ltd, as an authorised agent of the owner...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1477 APPLICANT NL RESPONDENT KS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Council APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: KS Ltd is to pay B Ltd $3,311.40 by Wednesday 16 September 2020. Reasons 1. A truck owned KS Ltd was being driven down [Road 1] in [Suburb] when it s...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 698 APPLICANT MU RESPONDENT OL The Tribunal orders: The claim by MU against OL is proved. OL is to pay MU the sum of $4,847.25 on or by 5:00 pm on 20 January 2024. Reasons 1. On 15 July 2023, in the [Suburb] shops carpark OL backed his car into the side of MU’s car causing damage. 2. Both MU and OL were sent a “notice of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 512 APPLICANT NM RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NM booked two return tickets for his children to [Country] travelling on 19 December 2023 and returning to New Zealand on 13 January 2024 with [Airline]. U Ltd, through whom NM had bought his tickets, contacted him to advise o...
...Ltd in smaller amounts on receipt of a purchase order until a new blanket order was required. In the past D Ltd’s account manager had contacted SB Ltd to let them know when a new blanket order was required. 3. In November 2019 a blanket order form had been signed by SB Ltd for around 5 pallets, which, based on usual usage, was expected to last until around December 2020 – in fact it lasted until March 2021 when the last of the jars was supplied to SB Ltd. At that time, D Ltd did n...
...amount on completion of the further work by the solicitor. 6. In total, F Ltd invoiced $11,083.65 for work done for YM’s court case. YM has paid $5400.00 towards the invoiced amounts plus the $1800.00 paid on her behalf by her solicitor. She requests a declaration of non-liability for the balance of $3883.65. 7. F Ltd counter-claims for payment of the balance of $3883.65 plus debt collection costs incurred of $2323.07. F Ltd sent the outstanding amount to debt collection in No...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 160 APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: SX’s claim against S Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The respondent provided monthly software services to the applicant at the cost of US$6.90 per month from January 2021. In August 2022, the cost of these services rose to US$69.00 per month. The applicant w...
...terms were so unclear I would have found that agreement unenforceable. 16. For the above reasons I award no interest on the base debt for the period of the loan being drawn down until the date it was due to be repaid. The Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 17. The Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 applies to this dispute. The primary purpose of this Act is to provide for the awards of interest as compensation for a delay in the payment of debts, damages, and other money claims in...
1 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 21 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6840: GRAEME WOODROFFE – Unit 2, 134 Waterfront Road, Mangonui ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Graeme Woodroffe is the owner of unit 2, 134 Waterfront Road, Mangonui. Unit 2 is a one level apartment in a multi-leve...