Search Results

1. [2023] NZIACDT 27 BT v Li (2 November 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...been declined on 22 February 2021. [5] It is understood that the complainant approached Ms Li. The client signed a service agreement with Fayo on 23 March 2021. Fayo undertook to file a s 61 request for a partnership work visa and later an application for a partnership resident visa. The fee for the s 61 request was $2,500. If the work was terminated, the fee would be based on the hours worked at $300 per hour. [6] On 10 May 2021, Ms Li filed with Immigration NZ a request fo...

2. BORA Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Bill [pdf, 616 KB]

   ...of the Bill is attached. 2. The Bill establishes a Tribunal to manage dispu tes between policyholders and insurers (the Earthquake Comrnission, Southern Response or other private insurers) arising out of Canterbut)' earthquake insurance claims. The Tribunal's ju risdiction will be.. limited to claims in respect of residential land and property, and includes: 2 1 Unsettled claimc; made for damage due to the earthquakes; 2.2 Reopened claims due to discovery of addit...

3. LL & TM v I Ltd & TE [2023] NZDT 730 (7 December 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...must share equal responsibility with I Ltd for their loss, I Ltd must pay them half of that sum, which is $5,558.31. [25] The applicants are entitled to interest on the sum that I have ordered that I Ltd must pay them. Under the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016, interest on the sum payable from 17 May to 5 December 2023 amounts to $165.44. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 6 [26] I have not allowed the applicants’ claim for compensation for stress. Damages for stress are unusu...

4. KC v DG [2023] NZDT 108 (22 March 2023) [pdf, 241 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 108 APPLICANT KC RESPONDENT DG The Tribunal orders: DG is to pay KC $869.43 on or before 12 April 2023. Reasons: 1. DG engaged KC to assist him with an urgent employment dispute regarding outstanding pay. 2. KC attempted to engage DG’s employer to resolve the dispute, without success. KC invoiced DG the sum o...

5. MS v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 284 (20 March 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 284 APPLICANT MS RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. MS purchased an induction cooktop from L Ltd on 7 January 2023 and says it cracked on 11 October (9 months later). He approached L Ltd who told him it was not deemed a manufacturing fault saying it was impact damage where something was...

6. H v EQC and Offshore Market Placement Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0025 [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...___________________________________________________________________________ [1] H has lodged a claim with the Tribunal concerning the damage he says was suffered by his property at xxxx, Christchurch, during the Canterbury earthquakes between 4 September 2010 and 13 June 2011. [2] H’s application to the Tribunal was accompanied by a letter to which was attached a Court of Appeal judgement dated xx xx. That Court dismissed his appeal and upheld the High Court decision rejectin...

7. Partridge & Anor as Trustees for the Partridge Family Trust v McClune [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...employee, director, shareholder or partner in the company or partnership that was contracted to carry out the plastering work. 7. Given the nature of the applications and the key jurisdictional issues involved, the parties were given an option of requesting a hearing to deal with the removal applications should they believe it be appropriate. Two of the respondents requested a hearing and accordingly a hearing convened in Tauranga on Tuesday 7th August 200...

8. OL v CD Ltd [2023] NZDT 711 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 230 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 711 APPLICANT OL RESPONDENT CD Limited The Tribunal orders: CD Limited is to pay directly to OL the sum of $1,050 on or before Wednesday, 31 January 2024. Once payment is made, OL is to release the two purchased scooters to the respondent. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties...

9. DY & DYD v VB [2016] NZDT 941 (1 April 2016) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that leave to apply for a rehearing ‘out of time’ is declined and that the original order dated 18 December 2015 is restored to full effect forthwith. Reasons [1] In considering the application to apply for a rehearing ‘out of time’, I have considered the reasons for the delay in filing a rehearing application, the strength of the grounds on which the rehearing application is based and the degree of harm to the appl...

10. NK v ND [2023] NZDT 754 (7 December 2023) [pdf, 183 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) RESULT OF APPLICATION FOR REHEARING [2023] NZDT 754 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim NK RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against ND Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 5 September 2023 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. NK filed a rehearing application on 28 September 2023, dated 22 Sept...