Search Results

1. JD v ACC (Leave to Appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 62 [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of Her Honour, Judge Henare, delivered on 12 December 2023.1 At issue in the appeal were the applicant’s head injury and entitlement to weekly compensation for incapacity dating back to claims in March 1996 and February 2008. The Court dismissed the appeal, for the reasons outlined below. 1 JD v Accident Compensation Corporation [2023] NZACC 202. 2 Background [2] The applicant was granted cover for contusions...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 78 Hall v Westpac NZ Ltd [pdf, 42 KB]

   GREGORY DOUGLAS HALL V WESTPAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 78 [9 May 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 78 ARC 82/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove proceedings to the Court BETWEEN GREGORY DOUGLAS HALL Applicant AND WESTPAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Respondent Hearing: Following memoranda filed on 8 May 2013 (At Auckland) Counsel: Tony Drake, counsel for applicant Phillipa Muir, co...

3. DD v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 536 (17 October 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 536 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: DD Must pay H Ltd $1,012.00 by 4pm on 7 November 2023. Reasons: 1. The respondent provided the services of an electrician to the applicant. The applicant was charged $1,257.38 for this work of which $195.00 has been paid to date. The applicant is unhappy with the work and the amo...

4. MG and WJ New Zealand Ltd v DI Ltd [2021] NZDT 1358 (15 January 2021) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...(being $400.00 uninsured losses and $5261.64 insured losses) to WJ New Zealand Ltd on or before 5 February 2021. NB. This claim includes insured and uninsured losses which had been incorrectly set up administratively by the Tribunal as two separate claims – I have merged the two files. Reasons 1. DI Limited (‘DIL’) installed a heat pump system at MG’s house (with the external unit at second storey level above the garage roof) in January 2019. 2. In August 2020 the exte...

5. T Ltd v M Ltd [2022] NZDT 191 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...to disconnect existing steam operated machines and install new steam and water pipes for new machines. The job was to be done in two stages, to ensure new the machines were up and running before old machines were disconnected. 2. The Applicant claims that the contract was time and materials and that no estimate or quote was provided. The Respondent claims that the Applicant provided a verbal estimate of $5,000.00 plus GST. 3. The job was expected to take 2 days but stage 1 took...

6. B Ltd v KY [2024] NZDT 781 (22 October 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 781 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT KY The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 21 March 2024, KY engaged B Ltd to repair lighting at her rental property on a charge-up basis. The work was completed, and KY paid the invoice for $1,310.83. 2. On 2 April 2024, B Ltd returned at KY’s request to adjust the lighting,...

7. LA Children's Workers exemption appeals Fee Schedule updated 29 Sep 22 [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...Initial instructions not followed through $290 For • taking instructions, attending the client • preparing application for legal aid • contacting the client • closing the file • reporting to client Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/order(s) Activity Fees T...

8. X Ltd v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 284 (25 July 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 284 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. X Ltd purchased some tractor duals (wheels) from K Ltd. SB from K Ltd and DP from X Ltd agreed that X Ltd could pick the duals up at any time from K Ltd’s yard. SB was not always at his yard in [City] and noticed about three...

9. UO Ltd & UI Ltd v BU & ND [2024] NZDT 528 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 528 APPLICANT UO Ltd RESPONDENT UI Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BU THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: 1. UI Ltd is to pay UO Ltd the amount of $3,586.68 on or before 12 August 2024. 2. UE’s name is corrected to be ND. 3. The claims against BU and ND are dismissed. Reason 1. UI Ltd had a c...

10. BW x XT [2022] NZDT 202 (12 December 2022) [pdf, 96 KB]

    Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 202 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT XT The Tribunal orders: XT is to pay $300.00 to BW by 25/1/23. Reasons: 1. XT was called twice: at the allocated time for this hearing and again 5 or so minutes later. Both calls were unanswered and went to a message service. Messages were left including that if the second call was not answered the hearing w...