11466 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 654 BETWEEN BD LIMITED APPLICANT AND YW RESPONDENT Date of Order: 28 November 2013 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed Facts [1] The applicant claims $5,202.37 in respect of goods to the value of $3,917.17 supplied to ABC Limited (“ABC”, company number #####) during 2011 and interest and enforcement costs. The...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 313 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT UX The Tribunal orders: UX is to pay the sum of $4,990.00 to EU on or before Friday 13 July 2023. Reasons: 1. In December 2022, UX (the supplier) provided a written quotation to EU (the consumer) to supply and install a 5m electronic driveway gate for $10,887.00. The consumer paid...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 499 APPLICANT DE RESPONDENT SC APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. SC and DE were involved in an accident at the intersection of [Street 1] and [Street 2] on 26 November 2022. 2. The accident took place at night, in rainy condition...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 16 APPLICANT FH RESPONDENT UO Ltd The Tribunal orders: UO Ltd is to pay FH $570.00 on or before 16 March 2023. Reasons 1. In 2021, FH bought tickets for a Guns n Roses concert from UO Ltd for $570.00. The concert was originally to be held in November 2021 but was postponed because of the Covid pandemic. The new date wa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 704 APPLICANT MA RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: MA’s claim against X Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MA booked to stay at X Ltd’s hostel for four nights in July 2023. Later in the evening on the second night, X Ltd’s staff asked MA to leave the hostel as they claimed she had breached the hostel rules. She left the hostel t...
...prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 123 APPLICANT LB RESPONDENT VB Ltd The Tribunal orders: VB Ltd is to pay the sum of $17,000.00 to LB by no later than 23 September 2022. Reasons: 1. LB claims he purchased a car from VB Ltd for $69,000 on 5 May 2021. The vehicle was purchased with finance of $39,000 from NUG. The balance of the purchase price...
...$65. If the financial statement is filed by the judgment creditor, the court can order the judgment debtor to repay the fee. Filing a financial statement of judgment debtor KEY WORDS Below are explanations of some of the words we use in this application form. Court order Issued by a court or tribunal that requires a person or organisation to do, or stop doing, something. Enforcement Action authorised by a court to get the judgment debtor to comply with a judgment or court o...
...$65. If the financial statement is filed by the judgment creditor, the court can order the judgment debtor to repay the fee. Filing a financial statement of judgment debtor KEY WORDS Below are explanations of some of the words we use in this application form. Court order Issued by a court or tribunal that requires a person or organisation to do, or stop doing, something. Enforcement Action authorised by a court to get the judgment debtor to comply with a judgment or court o...
...Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee, Director of Human Rights Proceedings, for plaintiff Mr Van Wijk in person Mr JLS Shaw for second and third defendants DATE OF ACCESS HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO TRIBUNAL FILE: 5 March 2019 DECISION OF CHAIRPERSON GRANTING ACCESS TO TRIBUNAL FILE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS1 1 [This decision is to be cited as A v Van Wijk (Access...