Search Results

1. [2016] NZSSAA 103 (8 December 2016) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...of the appellant Mr R Signal for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development DECISION Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive, upheld by a Benefits Review Committee, to decline an application for benefit assistance made on 29 July 2014. [2] A central issue in this case is whether or not the Chief Executive should have waived the requirement that the appellant provide a medical certificate to support his application f...

2. AEM v ZVK [2012] NZDT 316 (1 June 2012) [pdf, 80 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 316 BETWEEN AEM Ltd APPLICANT AND ZVK RESPONDENT Date of Order: 1 June 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZVK, pay the amount of $7,039.83 to the Applicant, AEM Ltd, on or before 15 June 2012. The counterclaim of the Respondent, AVK, is dismissed. Facts [1] The Applicant claims tha...

3. Ratima - Whirinaki 3 (formerly known as Whirinaki No 1 Section 2F2C) (2015) 126 Waiariki MB 73 (126 WAR 73) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...Copy to: Cara Bennett, Langley Twigg, PO Box 446, Ahuriri, Napier Email: cara@langleytwigg.co.nz mailto:cara@langleytwigg.co.nz 126 Waiariki MB 74 Introduction [1] This decision deals with an application for costs filed by Henare Ratima. Mr Ratima is the Chairperson of the Whirinaki 3 Ahu Whenua Trust (“the Trust”). He seeks an order for costs incurred by the trustees in responding to an application for a judicial conference...

4. Privacy Act 1993 and Privacy Act 2020

   ...107(3) Edwards v Capital and Coast DHB (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2016] NZHRRT 19 Closed hearing – jurisdiction to hold in IPP 6 cases - mootness – application of doctrine of mootness – whether Tribunal bound to refuse to adjudicate claim which is moot – whether jurisdiction to deliver decision in exceptional circumstances – power to regulate own procedure – Human Rights Act 1993, s 104(5) – Privacy Bill, cl 114A Bradbury v Police (Mootness) [2020] NZHRRT 1 Clos...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. Decisions - Index

5. RT Ltd v LC [2020] NZDT 1413 (27 July 2020) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1413 APPLICANT RT Ltd RESPONDENT LC SECOND RESPONDENT NC The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. LC is to pay RT Ltd $711.32 on or before 13 August 2020. 2. NC is struck out as a respondent party to the claim. Reasons: 1. RT Ltd operates a wheel clamping and towing business. RT Ltd alleges it clamped a vehi...

6. Practice Note 5 2018 Final [pdf, 369 KB]

   ...10. DATABASE OF DECISIONS 2 PREAMBLE This Practice Note is issued pursuant to section 220(2)(a) of the Immigration Act 2009 (“the Act”). It is effective for all appeals and matters determined by the Tribunal. The following information on the practice and procedure adopted by the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) in relation to the publication of its decisions is designed to provide guidance to members of the legal profession, immigration

7. [2021] NZACC 91 - Razek v ACC (29 June 2021) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Appearances: Mr L Hansen for the appellant Mr M Campbell and Ms B Walley for the respondent Judgment: 29 June 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J McGUIRE [Manner of Making a Claim s 60 Accident Insurance Act 1998] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] This is an appeal by the appellant against his unsuccessful review of the respondent’s decision to backdate his indepe...

8. BU v YA LCRO 153 / 2010 (21 April 2011) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...153/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee No.1 BETWEEN BU of Auckland Applicant AND YA of North Island Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] In April 2002, the Applicant and his former partner entered into a...

9. Wellington Standards Committee v Lester [2015] NZLCDT 23 [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...respondent has admitted failing her client in respect of each charge as follows: (a) Misconduct (i) Having been instructed in February 2011 to commence proceedings to recover a debt of $44,382.77, she failed to file in time a notice of pursuit of claim such that the proceedings came to an end apart from a counterclaim that had been filed by the defendant to the claim. 3 (ii) She did not advise the client that the claim was at an end and that the counterclaim was the only...

10. [2017] NZEnvC 125 Auckland Council v Mao Lau Jesus 2016 Co Ltd & Cao Cindy Property Management Ltd [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...Auckland Council is directed to serve Liansen Mao by: Auckland Council v Zhang & ors - ex p interim enforcement orders 2 (a) Delivering a physical copy of all of the enforcement order documentation (including the supporting affidavits) to 387 (formerly 423) Ormiston Road, Flat Bush. (b) Posting a physical copy of notice of the application to Mr Mao's address in China. (c) Posting a physical copy of notice of the application to PO Box 276138, Manukau City, Auckland....