Search Results

1. Phon v Waitakere City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 24 [pdf, 78 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000104 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 24 BETWEEN KIM YOUG PHON and KAO YUN Claimants AND WAITAKERE CITY COUNCIL First Respondent (Removed) AND MODERN HOME DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND DESIGN & BUILD CO LIMITED Third Respondent (Removed) AND DOUG KAILL Fourth Respondent (Removed) AND BARRY WALSH Fifth Respondent AND BRETT MCWILLIAMS Sixth Respondent AND WEI WEI ZHANG Seventh Res

2. [2007] NZEmpC AC 59/07 Paki v Panel Holdings Ltd [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...This interlocutory judgment deals with two issues. The first is whether Paania Paki should be entitled to prosecute her challenge to the determination of the Employment Relations Authority by a hearing de novo. The second issue deals with the application for leave to withdraw as counsel by Ms Paki’s lawyer. [2] After an investigation meeting on 5 July 2007 at which Panel Holdings Limited was represented by counsel, but there was no participation by Ms Paki, the Authority issued...

3. EU v LX [2019] NZDT 1487 (23 October 2019) [pdf, 194 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1487 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT LX The Tribunal hereby orders: LX is to pay the sum of $3,703.31 to EU on or before Wednesday 6 November 2019. Reasons: 1. In February 2014, LX and his former partner instructed EU to act on their behalf in relation to sale of a jointly owned property. LX’s share of the final...

4. Xu v Tian [2018] NZIACDT 42 (26 October 2018) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...includes allegations that she did not initially tell Ms Xu that the visa had been declined, that she failed to inform Ms Xu of her unlawful presence in New Zealand, that she failed to obtain instructions and that she misrepresented the nature of an application Ms Xu signed. [2] Ms Tian admits she made mistakes, that she was negligent and that she breached the Code of Conduct, but denies being dishonest or misleading. The essential issue to consider is whether Ms Tian’s conduct...

5. BC v BT [2021] NZDT 1625 (12 July 2021) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1625 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT BT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. BC purchased a [laptop] in December 2015. In September 2019 the laptop was not charging. BC took the laptop for repair. The BT agent tested the battery, cleaned the laptop inside, did a CMS and NVRAM reset, then...

6. IT v UO [2021] NZDT 1578 (11 August 2021) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1578 APPLICANT IT RESPONDENT UO The Tribunal orders: UO is to pay the sum of $2,568.10 to IT on or before Wednesday 25 August 2021. Reasons: 1. On 15 December 2020, IT and another person entered into an agreement to purchase a property at [address], from UO and another person for $550,000.00. Settlement took place...

7. BE v TU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1568 (29 July 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1568 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT TU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. On 14 May 2021 BE’s car was towed from a private parking area. He paid $320.00 to recover the car. Today he is claiming the $320.00 saying the signage was unclear, he was not aware he could not park his car where he did, th...

8. NE & LE v IN & KC & CN [2020 NZDT 1537 (20 July 2020) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...non-functional, the bottom vane was not opening and closing due to broken plastic, the indoor coil was only achieving 37 degrees on heat mode (the target being 45-52 degrees), and the refrigerant was low and banned for sale in New Zealand. 2. The applicants now claim $3,740.00 for the cost of a new heat pump since spare parts and refrigerant are not available to repair the old heat pump. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Was the heat pump in reasonable working order? b) If not,...

9. [2021] NZACC 12 - Mudgway v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...at: Napier/Ahuriri Appearances: Ms Williams for the appellant Ms Feltham for the respondent Judgment: 12 January 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE DENESE HENARE [Claim for Cover for Personal Injury – sections 20 and 48 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] The appellant, Evan Mudgway challenges the Corporation’s decision da...

10. AQ v ZJ [2014] NZDT 562 (16 April 2014) [pdf, 74 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 562 BETWEEN AQ APPLICANT AND ZJ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 16 April 2014 Referee: Referee Murphy ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the family name of the respondent is amended because the name was spelt incorrectly on the claim. The respondent (ZJ) is to pay the applicants (AQ) $1,405 by 5 May 2014. Facts [1] AQ (the applicants) and ZJ (the respondent) had a...