12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 195 APPLICANT KW RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay KW $609.00 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. In September 2020, T Ltd supplied and installed a gate automation system at KW’s property. In September 2021, there was an issue with the gate not working. KW called T Ltd, who visited...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 302 APPLICANT UL RESPONDENT TS APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. B Ltd is added as a party to the claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UL visited TS’s property as a prospective tenant. He parked on a gravel car park next to the lawn. 2. TS was mowing the lawn. S...
...response as in the years prior to 2008 his membership had been renewed without any formality upon payment of the annual fee. He had not previously been asked to submit a formal application and supporting documents and did not on this occasion submit the requested application. [6] In early August 2014 Mr David Aldridge, a friend of Mr Brooks, tried to renew Mr Brooks’ membership of TUNZ. Mr Aldridge has trained and competed in Taekwondo for the past 37 years and has represented New Z...
...NZTA has interfered with his privacy. [3] NZTA disputes that there has been any interference with Mr Pillay’s privacy and claims immunity in respect of both the disclosures. BACKGROUND [4] In November 2014 Mr Pillay imported the car and requested advice and repair from Mr Barlass, a NZTA accredited repair certifier. Mr Barlass worked with Bute Collision Repairs to have the repairs done for Mr Pillay. The car was then presented to VTNZ for compliance certification in accordance...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 310 APPLICANT NB RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NB purchased a car from U Ltd on 24 January 2023. A week after purchase, the car was broken into and the left front window smashed for entry. 2. After the break-in, the electric control for the left-front window would not...
...Taking instructions, attending the client • Preparing application for legal aid • Attempting to contact the client • Closing the file • Reporting to client • Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/Order(s) Activity...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 34 APPLICANT UI and II RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In late 2020 UI and II took their [car] to D Ltd because there was a leak between the convertible roof and the windscreen. UI and II say that they had read online that the seals can open up a bit and to ask the de...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 214 APPLICANT OOJ RESPONDENT QD Inc The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. OOJ is in the business of running poker events. In April 2022 OOJ was approached at one of their events by BE who apparently introduced himself as the manager of QD Inc. 2. BE entered into a contract with OOJ to run we...
...Client Care Rules, and that this constituted unsatisfactory conduct. The Committee determined that the finding of unsatisfactory conduct recorded against his professional file, and an apology, were a sufficient penalty. It declined to consider the Applicant‟s claims for compensation. [3] The Committee concluded that P2‟s conduct was unsatisfactory in that he had failed to act in a competent and timely manner and failed to keep his client fully 2 informed. The Prac...
...before the Maori Land Court at Palmerston North on 4 September 2001 for determination of Te Matai Kawana Whanau Trust and constitution of the TRL Whanau Trust and orders were made accordingly. 2. At the same time an application was made by one of the applicants Rangi Paki for reimbursement of costs incurred by him in relation to the applications he had made to the Maori Land Court on behalf of his family. 3. The Court adjourned the question as to reimbursement of costs and stated that...