12972 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 464 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT BG The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KH had a pre-existing personal guarantee to pay rent. KH says BG agreed, when she became a director in the company, she would guarantee the rent liability under cl 5.9 of the sale and purchase agreement. The company went into liquidatio...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 576 APPLICANT DO RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DO is the head tenant of a property on [Address] and listed a room [online]. As a result, CH moved into the flatting situation and signed a fixed term agreement from 1 February 2024 to 8 May 2024. The agreement did not include a notice period c...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 180 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT KL SECOND RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by SQ against KL is dismissed. 2. The claim by SQ against L Ltd is proved and L Ltd is to pay SQ the sum of $13,820.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 15 July 2023. 3. The counterclaim by L Ltd against SQ is dismissed. Reasons 1....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 181 APPLICANT NX APPLICANT PX RESPONDENT Airline X The Tribunal orders: [Airline X] is to pay to NX and PX the sum of $1,298.20 on or before 20 October 2022. Reasons: 1. NX and PX (“the applicants”) booked flights directly with [Airline X] in May 2022. They were scheduled to travel from [City A] to [Cit...
...Insurance Tribunal (“the Tribunal”), as committed to in the Labour Party’s 2017 election manifesto, to provide an alternative pathway for claimants, the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and insurers to resolve outstanding earthquake-related insurance claims. Executive Summary 2 The 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes generated insurance claims in relation to over 167,677 residential properties. 98% of these claims have settled. However, seven years on, 2% of claims remain unresolve...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 30 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: BT’s claim against CH is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The parties lived together for a period of time. The applicant claims the respondent agreed to make payments to him or contribute towards living expenses each week in lieu of rent and other costs. The applicant claims...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 46 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT DG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 8 June 2020, the applicant ET purchased a car on finance in his own name for the respondent DG. The parties were friends, and had previously been in a relationship for around three months. Part of the arrangement was that the r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 282 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT CD (NZ) Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] BL wanted to find a serviced apartment for himself and his family for a proposed visit to [International City]. He entered a “CD” website, and went through the process of booking an apartment, for which he paid NZ$17,000.00. Subsequently,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 336 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: NS is to pay DN $3,252.34 on or before 22 June 2024. Reasons Introduction 1. DN’s husband SN was driving her car at [location]. He came out of the main underground carpark and entered the roundabout. NS was in the right hand turning lane to the right of SN. NS turned left into SN. 2...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 548 APPLICANT MG RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Reasons 1. L Ltd is a [housing agency] who leases properties from owners and then subleases them to people who need [housing]. One such property (the neighbouring property) is next to MG’s property. 2. One of the tenants of the neighbouring property moved a...