Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12972 items matching your search terms

  1. ABR v ZYN and ZYM [2013] NZDT 35 (20 May 2013) [pdf, 91 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 35 BETWEEN ABR Ltd APPLICANT AND ZYN Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZYM Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 May 2013 Referee: Referee Edison ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZYN Ltd shall pay ABR Ltd the sum of $5,442.56 by 4pm on 3 June 2013. The claim against ZYM Ltd is dismissed. Facts [1] LG owns and runs a dairy in [a place...

  2. OB v CM [2024] NZDT 121 (26 April 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 121 APPLICANT OB RESPONDENT CM The Tribunal orders: 1. CM trading as X Co is to pay $72.00 to OB by the 16th May 2024. 2. Upon receipt of payment, OB is to return her damaged dog collar to CM trading as D Co within 7 days of receipt. Reasons 1. OB purchased a dog collar from CM for a “large strong dog” online for $72 including fre...

  3. KG v OAU [2022] NZDT 225 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 95 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 225 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT OAU APPLICANT INSURER BBJ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. Around midday on Sunday 12 June 2022 KG was traveling on state highway 1 near [Town] when his car drove over a large pothole. There were was no speed reduction signs or anything to alert hi...

  4. KB v NX [2024] NZDT 510 (25 July 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 510 APPLICANT KB RESPONDENT NX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 24 January 2024 KB entered into an agreement to purchase a section from NX. The section did not have a house as it had burnt down, and the debris had been removed. All that remained was an old garage with an attached carport, which contai...

  5. QU v UQ & J Ltd [2024] NZDT 522 (9 July 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 522 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT UQ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: UQ is to pay J Ltd $6,420.80 by 31 July 2024. Reasons 1. QU and UQ were involved in an accident on [road] on 13 June 2023. 2. QU stopped at a pedestrian crossing. UQ failed to stop and hit the rear of QU’s [vehicle]....

  6. HT v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 2 (5 January 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 2 APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT Q Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) DM Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. In terms of the counterclaim HT is to pay Q Ltd $1,552.50 on or before 5.00pm on 2 February 2024. Reasons: 1. HT decided to use Q Ltd for cleaning after she was the victim of a ram...

  7. INZ v Soni [2018] NZIACDT 6 (9 March 2018) [pdf, 315 KB]

    ...adviser, lawyer or included in certain other specific categories of persons. There are some limited exceptions to the general principle, but the restriction applies everywhere in the world. [3] The regime requires licensed immigration advisers to perform the services personally. They are different from other professionals who can usually allow non-qualified staff to provide many services under the supervision of a qualified professional. [4] This Tribunal, unfortunately, has been...

  8. Guo v Culpan (Strike-Out) [2018] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 127 KB]

    ...an additional defendant, “CityMed Medical Centre”, to the proceeding. This is the name of the practice where Dr Culpan saw Ms Guo. [8] On 1 May 2018, the Co-Chairperson issued a Minute where, amongst other things, she declined Ms Guo’s application to file the amended claim. Leaving aside the issue of jurisdiction, the filing of evidence in the claim was by then complete, and a fixture had been allocated for 14 May 2018. In these circumstances, the Co-Chairperson stated she...

  9. HH & HT v WT Ltd [2023] NZDT 22 (28 February 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 22 APPLICANT HH APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT WT Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. WT Ltd is to pay HH and HT $25.00 each, being a total of $50.00 on or before 5pm on 28 March 2023. Reasons 1. HH and HT paid $65.00 each for a bottomless brunch at WT Ltd. They were told, after they ordered their first round of food, that

  10. [2020] NZEnvC 026 Burgoyne v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...pursuant to s 279 and s 285 of the Act on the papers A Burgoyne (Applicant for Costs) A Green for Motutangi-Waiharara Water Users Group (Applicants for Costs) G Mathias for Northland Regional Council 1 3 MAR 2020 1 3 MAR 2020 DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR COSTS A BURGOYNE /TE TAUMATA KAUMATUA O NGATI KURI RESEARCH UNIT v NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL (DECISION) 2 A: The Court makes no Order as to costs for the reasons set out in this Decision. The file may be closed. B:...